Amid changes, immigrants are
targets
By LESLIE WIRPSA
NCR Staff Los Angeles
During a Columbus Day parade in Newark, N.J., Republican
presidential nominee Bob Dole praised a group of people that in other contexts
he has been inclined to blame for a number of America's problems --
immigrants.
Dole did not laud Mexican or Central American or Asian newcomers
who are bearing the brunt of welfare and immigration reform measures recently
passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton. Instead, he hailed
"generations of Italian families (who) have come to America to live out their
dreams ... strengthened America with their values ... values that helped make
America what it is today."
Some of those Italians' ancestors might take issue with Dole's
rhapsodic recounting of immigrant life in an earlier time. Bashing immigrants
is, after all, a thoroughly American enterprise. We have done it regularly
throughout history (see accompanying story).
And we are doing it today. Despite what Dole or Clinton might say
about the gifts immigrants bring to U.S. society, the president signed the
severe reform measures into law and Dole supported proposals to prohibit
children of undocumented immigrants from attending public schools.
So Dole's words raise a pressing question: Beyond the use of
immigration by both parties as a wedge to sway votes, what is underpinning the
movement against the immigrant poor in the 1990s?
Analysts interviewed traced the current anti-immigrant sentiments
to an intersection of historical, economic, demographic and race-related
factors particularly evident in Southern California. It was the initial
backlash in California that fueled the anti-immigrant sentiment throughout the
rest of the country.
University of California professor of sociology and communications
Sandra Ball-Rokeach said the deeper context of the attacks on immigrants "is
the sense, especially among Anglo populations but not exclusively, that the old
order is dying and being replaced." Increasingly, she said, sectors of
privilege feel they are losing control over what is the definition of American
society.
"There's a feeling that if Anglo culture loses it's dominance, the
ramification would be the loss of political power and therefore loss of
economic advantage." Adding to this are racial undertones brought on by shifts
in U.S. demographics that are creating a much more multicultural society,
Ball-Rokeach said.
"The bottom line is our political system says the majority rules,
and the majority may end up being brown or black or yellow or all of them and
not white. The feeling is how do we accept majority rule when the majority is
not going to be Anglo and European?" she said. Things like immigration do not
inspire a lot of complex analysis, but "fall along in the rather predictable
pattern of people targeting scapegoats," Ball-Rokeach said.
Clare Pastore of the Western Center on Law and Poverty, a legal
organization challenging in court the recent provisions passed by Congress to
slash welfare benefits to the immigrant population, said that, although the
economy by traditional measures is faring well, an ambience of economic anxiety
pervades America. With temporary and involuntary part-time employment on the
rise, "many people feel insecure about their own jobs." Pastore said this
"leads to scapegoating, whether for immigrants or women or people of color.
That's the American tradition."
Within this tradition, said Luis Velásquez, acting director
for Hispanic ministry at the Los Angeles archdiocese, Latinos are the modern
day "prisoners of a history that repeats itself every 20 years when the need
arises to fight against immigrants." Velásquez pointed out that other
immigrant groups in history, such as Asians, suffered miserably because of
racial discrimination.
Velásquez dates the beginning of the backlash against
Latinos in California to the early 1990s and the aftermath of the downsizing of
nearly 500,000 military industry jobs statewide and the increase of immigration
from Mexico. California, at the time, was undergoing severe financial
difficulties.
Sylvia Gonzalez, director of the International Institute, a United
Way institution that has been aiding immigrants and refugees for 72 years, said
attitudes of the general population toward immigrants went from "the sublime to
the ridiculous" in a very short time. "People all of a sudden started saying,
'We have to take care of our own.' I don't know where this came from, but
people were somehow not aware of the number of immigrants arriving and suddenly
they were aware and decided immigrants were taking over," she said.
Politicians played on the fear to whip up "anti-immigrant
hysteria," said Roberto Lovato, an expert on immigration and former director of
the Central American Resource Center here. The political rhetoric created a
"new category of undesirables -- criminal aliens, criminal welfare alien moms,
gangster youth aliens, children as parasites of schools." The creation by media
and politicians of these "post-industrial demons" masks deeply seated fears of
people in the United States about "the abandonment of the American worker."
Ball-Rokeach said the fear and unease are real. "Everyone's work
situation is so dramatically changing. There is this sense that, 'Gee, I don't
know what is happening and why.' There is unease about who is doing this to us,
why two adults in the family both now work."
The gap between rich and poor, increasing worldwide, has reached
new heights, Lovato said. "A multinational rich class is forming," he said.
"(The multinational class) is controlling multinational organizations that
divide up countries, regions, sectors of labor and the consumer market in new
ways for the ultimate enrichment of a few."
These massive transformations and shifts of control are the deeper
causes of American fears and anxieties in the 1990s -- not immigration -- the
analysts said.
The global trends, Ball-Rokeach said, are prompting a sense that
"the very meaningfulness of national identities are under very serious question
at this point in time ... that what it means to be American is changing or
threatened." In this context, people are feeling that the national government
is increasingly ineffectual, "but they don't know why," she said.
National Catholic Reporter, November 1,
1996
|