Balasuriya, supporters appeal to
tribunal
By PAMELA SCHAEFFER
NCR Staff
Contrary to reports that a Vatican court has rejected an appeal by
Oblate Fr. Tissa Balasuriya of Sri Lanka, the recently excommunicated
theologian said that the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signature is
considering his case.
Citing canon law, Balasuriya said in a telephone interview that he
considers his excommunication to be suspended pending the outcome of his
appeal.
Balasuriya, accused by the Vatican of deviating from central
truths of the Roman Catholic church, said he had recently received a letter
from the tribunal inviting him to engage a canon lawyer to serve as his
advocate in presenting his case.
The Vatican tribunal is the highest judicial body with authority
over procedural propriety in church matters. Balasuriya claims that he has been
denied due process by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which
declared him excommunicated in early January.
Meanwhile, 150 religious leaders from England and Wales have
written the Vatican expressing "shock and dismay" at Balasuriya's
excommunication and asking that it be revoked. According to a news release, the
signers, members of the Conference of Religious in England and Wales, represent
10,000 religious men and women.
Also, Balasuriya, 72, has made public a lengthy and detailed reply
to recent remarks about his case by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who heads the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Ratzinger spoke about Balasuriya's
excommunication during a news conference on Jan. 24 in Rome. Balasuriya's reply
is dated Feb. 1.
As reported in the London-based Tablet, Ratzinger said at
the news conference that the congregation had found "many things which are
unacceptable" in Balasuriya's 1990 book Mary and Human Liberation. The
problem, Ratzinger said, was far broader than Balasuriya's views on allowing
women to be Catholic priests.
Right to appeal
Following Balasuriya's unsuccessful appeal to Pope John Paul II on
Dec. 7, Ratzinger's congregation declared in early January that Balasuriya
could no longer be considered a Catholic theologian and, moreover, that his
theological views set him outside the church.
Balasuriya, a priest for 44 years and one of Asia's best-known
theologians, was declared excommunicated latae sententiae -- that is,
automatically -- under Canon 1364 of the church's Code of Canon Law. The ruling
applies to apostates and heretics.
Reports that his appeal to the Apostolic Signature had been
rejected apparently stemmed from a letter to Balasuriya, dated Jan. 24, from
Archbishop Osvaldo Padilla. Padilla is apostolic nuncio to Sri Lanka.
Padilla said in his letter that Balasuriya had no right to an
appeal because the pope himself had declined to intervene in the case,
indicating that he approved of the way it had been handled.
At the news conference, Ratzinger said one of the problems with
Balasuriya's writings is that they exhibit Marxist influences.
Further, Ratzinger said he had decided against entering into a
full discussion of theological perspectives in Balasuriya's book -- a statement
that Balasuriya said essentially confirmed his view that the Vatican had
short-circuited due process.
In order "to avoid an interminable discussion which would not be
useful to anyone," the congregation had opted to ask Balasuriya to sign a
profession of faith, Ratzinger said. The congregation regarded that option as
"a more positive way forward," he said.
Ratzinger said the profession, drawn up specifically for
Balasuriya, focused on points considered key to the theologian's case and
derived from official church teachings. "We have not invented anything," he
said.
The profession asked Balasuriya to acknowledge that the church
"has no authority whatsoever to ordain women." But Ratzinger denied that
Balasuriya's case turned on that issue. A greater problem, he said, was
Balasuriya's approach to the doctrine of original sin.
Balasuriya argues in his book that the doctrine of original sin
has no basis in the gospels, but evolved as the church began to define itself
as the sole mediator of salvation, thereby giving the clergy considerable power
over the faithful.
He strongly denies that he has deviated from central church
teachings and argues that the Vatican has distorted his views.
According to Balasuriya, his perspective on the doctrine is
important because the church's teaching on original sin requires
reinterpretation for the large non-Christian majority of Sri Lanka. Many
Asians, he says, find it unthinkable that human beings are alienated from their
Creator at birth.
Against accusations by Balasuriya and other Asian theologians that
the Vatican is insensitive to the Asian context in which Balasuriya works,
Ratzinger said at the news conference, "We are very sensitive to the situation
of this great Asian continent, so decisive for the future of humanity. We are
very attentive not to quench the flame of the appropriation and creation of an
Asian identity for the Catholic faith."
To bring faith to Asians
He added, "Perhaps this is one of the greatest challenges for the
church of the third millennium, to bring faith in Christ, the Son of God made
man, finally to the Asian soul."
Instead of signing the profession of faith provided by the
Vatican, Balasuriya signed one written by Pope Paul VI. Ratzinger said
Balasuriya's signature on that profession would have exonerated him had he not
added a caveat. Balasuriya wrote that he was signing the Paul VI profession "in
the context of theological development and church practice since Vatican II and
the freedom and responsibility of Christians and theological searchers under
canon law."
Ratzinger acknowledged that the congregation runs the risk of
substituting itself for theologians. But it is not the congregation's goal, he
said, to propose one normative theology. Rather, he said, it is obliged to show
where theologies are incompatible with central church teachings -- "to recall
the forgotten elements which should be kept in mind in the construction of
every Catholic theology."
The congregation's goal, he said, was to provide "the greatest
possible space to the creative reflection of theologians without necessarily
forcing them into schemes that are obligatory for all."
In Balasuriya's response to Ratzinger's remarks, he wrote, "I do
not accept the charge ... that I have 'deviated' from the truth of the Catholic
faith. The CDF has not proved this."
Regarding Ratzinger's statement about Balasuriya's signature to
Pope Paul VI's profession of faith, Balasuriya asked, "If there is anything
defective invalidating my signature ... why did the CDF not inform me" until
seven months later, and then only "in the notification of my
excommunication?"
He also asked, "If women's ordination was not a critical issue,
why did the CDF introduce the clause concerning it in the profession of faith
drafted for me?"
He added: "Do not many other writers, especially from Europe, hold
views on original sin similar to mine? What then of canonical equity?"
As for Ratzinger's assertion about Marxist influences, Balasuriya
said, "This is the first time that the issue of Marxist influence has been
raised concerning my work during the past 50 months and more of this affair,
here in Sri Lanka or in Rome."
Gospels and Marx
"How do you come to this conclusion now?" Balasuriya asked
Ratzinger in his open letter.
Were Jesus' teachings on social justice based on Marxism, he
asked, adding: "Was the Asian Jesus influenced by Karl Marx when he condemned
the falsified religiosity of the high priests, the hypocritical Pharisees and
other religious exploiters of the day? Was it Marxist influence that made Jesus
chase the money changers from the temple of Jerusalem? Was the Magnificat of
Mary with its radical message of social, political and cultural transformation
influenced by the 19th-century European Karl Marx?"
Regarding process, Balasuriya noted Ratzinger's statement that it
was a "a very difficult task" to interpret Mary and Human Liberation
"exactly down to the final word and the final phraseology," leading to the
decision to require Balasuriya to sign the profession of faith.
"By this observation you clearly admit that the CDF has not
established error in my book," Balasuriya wrote. He noted that Ratzinger had
"curtly dismissed" Balasuriya's 55-page detailed response to its "observations"
on his book with only one word: "unsatisfactory."
He added, "It is either that what I have stated in the book does
not offend the truths ... or the blemishes I am alleged to have committed are
of such a minimal gravity that they could be corrected with a signature to a
profession of faith."
Balasuriya said he was unable to sign the Vatican's profession
because "it is punitive and presumes my error ... is not a profession of faith
that the church proposes regularly to all Catholics or theologians (and) ... is
not in keeping with the Catholic truth as proposed by Vatican II concerning the
salvation of those who are not Catholic."
In declaring his excommunication suspended in light of his appeal,
Balasuriya cited canons 1353 and 1638, which deal with appeals and suspended
penalties.
Challenging that interpretation, Padilla, the nuncio, cited
Balasuriya's direct appeal to the pope and Canon 333, which states, "There is
neither appeal nor recourse against a decision or decree of the Roman
Pontiff."
Sources familiar with Vatican dealings say Balasuriya's appeal to
the pope does make the case difficult for the Apostolic Signature, because the
tribunal -- even though it considers procedure rather than doctrine -- would be
reluctant to rule in apparent contradiction of the pope.
The letter from religious leaders in England and Wales asks
Ratzinger "in the name of justice" to revoke the excommunication "and to
arrange for a due process of law to be observed and for Fr. Tissa to be given
the opportunity with the help of other theologians to defend himself and clear
his name.
"We ask you, also, in the name of the human treatment owing to a
man who has been a faithful servant of the church throughout his religious life
and out of consideration for his age, to revoke such an extraordinary and final
condemnation," the religious leaders wrote.
National Catholic Reporter, February 14,
1997
|