Dismay greets Vatican curbs on Mexican
institutes
By GARY MacEOIN
Special to the National Catholic Reporter
Widespread anger and dismay characterize the reaction of members
of religious orders and congregations in Mexico to the suspension by Rome of
the activities of two teaching centers of the Conference of Mexican Religious
Institutes, and to the restrictions placed on two similar centers operated by
the Society of Jesus.
Those directly affected are reluctant to be quoted. The entire
process is cloaked in suspicion and fear of retaliation. But tension is high.
One person summed up the situation for NCR this way: "It's the whole
problem of this damn autocratic church that doesn't want to have any
consultation or collegiality.
"We're going back to the way the curia behaved at the 1992 meeting
of the Latin American bishops in Santo Domingo, [Dominican Republic,] when it
tried unsuccessfully to ram its views down the throats of the bishops."
Two years ago the Vatican Congregation for Catholic Education,
headed by Cardinal Pio Laghi, undertook an investigation of all institutions
run by religious orders in Latin America to prepare candidates for the
priesthood.
The Mexican investigating group was headed by Javier Lozano
Barragan, then bishop of Zapatecas and now head of the Pontifical Council for
Health Care Workers in Rome. The Mexican investigation extended to institutions
of the Conference of Religious that teach religious brothers and sisters and
lay people.
Lozano and Apostolic Delegate Girolamo Prigione are responsible
for widening the scope of the investigation in Mexico and for the restrictions
now imposed, according to José Alvarez Icaza and others who spoke to
NCR. Alvarez Icaza is head of the National Center of Social
Communication in Mexico City, an activist organization with Catholic roots but
no official connection to the church.
He and his wife, Luz Maria, were the only lay people invited to
participate in the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. At the time, they were
the presidents of the Latin American Section of the Christian Family Movement,
the group they represented at council proceedings.
"I have a copy of a report by Lozano," Alvarez Icaza told
NCR, "that scarifies the Jesuits. The ultimate objective is to allow
theological instruction only in 'safe' centers. It's all tied up with the war
on liberation theology. The very word makes them nervous." Also involved,
Alvarez Icaza believes, is Prigione's continuing opposition, in collaboration
with the Mexican government, to Bishop Samuel Ruiz Garcia of San Cristobal de
las Casas in Chiapas, who is identified in one of Laghi's letters as one of the
disapproved authors being taught in these institutions.
The issue of liberation theology was raised in a letter from Laghi
to some Mexican bishops, a letter leaked to the press at the same time as
another letter from the cardinal addressed to the superior of the Jesuits in
Mexico.
Some of the teaching centers, it said, had "a highly radicalized
and socialist-tinged orientation of liberation theology" and also "at times a
strong adversarial character and theological progressivism in dogmatic and
moral matters." Moreover, the letter added, "they had abandoned the
'magisterial' style of teaching, substituting one that is known as 'active' or
'seminar-style.' " In other words, said Alvarez Icaza, students shouldn't be
allowed to ask questions.
The Mexican Jesuits in a news release insist on their "full
communion with Rome" and their acceptance of the measures of the Congregation
for Catholic Education. They also wish "to make public their commitment to work
to correct and improve whatever may be necessary in order to better serve the
church and society."
There is, however, "a serious misunderstanding in the arguments on
which these measures are based," said the release. "They do not reflect the
type of theological teaching that is described in the letter that was sent to
the provincial superior in Mexico, Mario López Barrio. On the contrary,
both institutions have exerted themselves to transmit theological reflection
that is fully Catholic, faithful to the gospel, with the preferential option
for the poor, which the church itself has inspired us with and which our
bishops have so clearly made their own."
Referring to Rome's decision to limit the Theological Institute to
Jesuit students exclusively, the news release notes that the institute began to
admit members of other religious congregations more than 35 years ago at the
request of the then apostolic delegate, Luigi Raimondo. The news release ends
by expressing surprise "that a document that was sent privately to the
provincial superior of the Society of Jesus in Mexico has been published in the
press."
A response to the congregation from the Conference of Religious is
expected shortly after Easter. The tone of the response was described to
NCR by Miguel Concha, provincial of the Dominicans in Mexico and a
member of the governing board of the conference.
"We are approaching this," he said, "in a spirit of communion,
seeking a dialogue in charity."
He regretted that the dialogue had not taken place before the
decision was made, while emphasizing that the conference's teaching institutes
have not been closed, but only suspended until changes agreeable to the
Congregation for Catholic Education have been introduced.
National Catholic Reporter, April 4,
1997
|