Preaching Critic hears well-developed homily in Virginia
By ARTHUR
JONES NCR Staff
Note: This is the first in a series of four
reviews of homilies.
A disembodied voice wished everyone a quadraphonic "Good morning."
Eerie -- no one to reply to, at least no one visible from the transept.
Then came organ music, pleasant, not overpowering. All involved in
the liturgy, choir included, began processing in, with a pleasing ease rather
than a fussy formality. There were no female altar servers in the group -- this
is the Arlington, Va., diocese.
The congregation looked like mainly professional, middle-class
families; average age appeared to be just under 50 with a strong contingent of
elderly. The large urban-suburban church was possibly 80 percent filled, the
makeup primarily white and about 55 percent female, with a few black, brown and
Asian faces.
The presider had a pleasant and welcoming visage, a slightly
Anglican sound to his rolling oratory. The congregation came through with
strong responses. The church had an echo. There was one reader, a male. During
the reading from Psalms one could hear every word and there was a strong
Alleluia. A deep-voiced deacon read the gospel. Good intonations.
The homily dealt with the individual's concepts and self-image and
what role God played in our self-image.
"Who do we consider ourselves to be?" the priest asked. He added,
"We have a tendency to become whatever we consider ourselves to be."
But we did not make the decision alone, he said, rather in
reaction to something or someone. We could be reacting to a father we could
never please or a mother who was overprotective, "leaving you with more than
your share of self-doubt and fear, or a teacher who never saw your potential
and blamed it on a lack of ability."
While some of us recognize ourselves in these descriptions, he
continued, it leaves us confused as to who we are and we need a different way
of seeing ourselves.
We are much more what God says we are, a thought strongly backed
by the readings of the day from John and Paul, "that we are God's children.
"What about our sins? Some are so caught up in guilt," said the
priest, that we clog the confessionals with nonsense sins.
"Sin is not the defining reality of our lives."
God, he said, always sees the individual's potential, much as we
see the potential of an infant we've taken into our arms. By understanding our
capacity as Christians to change and be changed, "our true identity comes with
being one of God's children, and that means with the business of being more
like Christ."
Dominican Fr. John Burke was elsewhere in that same church, taking
notes, watching, listening, preparing to deliver his critique.
In the 1950s, the Korean War period, draftee John Burke was in
uniform in Germany. Later, with a BA and MA in drama from The Catholic
University of America, he became an NBC television associate producer and,
later still, a member of the Dominicans, also known as the Order of
Preachers.
In preaching workshops, in contrast to his ebullient colleague
Bill Graham, the low-key Burke makes his point with quiet comments and a
quizzical expression that semaphores to the preacher-cum-student that all is
going well. Or not.
A jogger and an indefatigable preacher himself -- he preached
parish missions almost nonstop from ordination until the late 1970s -- Burke
admits to being a woefully slow homily preparer. Learning that the North
Virginia priest he had just heard took five hours to prepare his homily, Burke
said, "[Jesuit Fr.] Walter Burghardt told me he takes 60 hours to prepare a
homily. I don't take that long, but I do take a long time."
Why does Burke, author of books on preaching, think he's a good
teacher of preaching? Caught off guard and a bit embarrassed by the question,
he replied, "My students, by and large, are very good." He said, "I have
confidence that what I'm doing is good teaching."
How good was this day's preaching?
"Good pastoral practice," said Burke, "is when the preacher has an
empathy with his audience, understands and communicates a sense of interest in
them and their needs. He is able to articulate what their needs are and at the
same time give a gospel message that will meet their needs."
Often that doesn't happen, said Burke, and the congregation hears
the opposite, a homily "up there in the abstract, too academic.
"This man was very down-to-earth. He did identify the need very
well, the idea of who am I, the self-identity. He used very good, homey
examples that people could immediately connect with. I could imagine that most
people in that congregation had one or the other of the experiences he
mentioned -- mother, father, teacher. Absolutely."
Burke said he thought the priest had an excellent basic statement,
that "we are children of God. A basic statement in 10 words or less is the
unifying principle of the homily.
"His flip side was, 'that's hard to believe,' but he developed it
well, supported with scripture what he said, and held the whole thing
together," Burke said, "in a tight structure."
The homilist did build to a climax, Burke said. "Also, another
good sign the people were with him -- he got laughter. A joke goes flat if they
haven't been listening." This was a read homily, "but well read," said Burke,
"and I have no problem with that. You know darn well it's been prepared."
As for delivery, the homily did seem "to go along on the same note
and at the same pace, though not seriously." The sentences were a bit long --
"not more than 10 words [is recommended] for a nice, punchy oral style, and
always Anglo-Saxon vocabulary, and not Romance language vocabulary.
"And he could have used pauses better," said Burke. "He had some
wonderful lines there that if he'd just thrown them out and maybe lifted the
voice, then taken a pause after them ... " And, "finally, a little thing. I
don't think he was sensitive enough -- perhaps not even aware of it -- that he
used nothing but male pronouns and male examples. I think he could have better
recognized that there are in fact two sexes in the world."
This homilist, said Burke, "had a nice voice, pleasant and with a
resonance that carried well, one in which you put confidence, and it was
relaxed. He had good energy, wasn't dragging. Consequently he made us
interested in his well-developed, well-delivered homily."
National Catholic Reporter, August 1,
1997
|