Viewpoint In death penalty debate, whats best done
in remembrance of Jesus?
By CAMILLE
DARIENZO
For many homilists, the two most difficult subjects are the
Blessed Trinity and capital punishment. In the first instance, its hard
to interpret so profound a mystery. In the second instance, emotions overwhelm
faith and reason. Outrage and fear influence ones sense of justice as
much as a longing for forgiveness and redemption.
Its reasonable to assume that, within any congregation,
there are people who support capital punishment and others who oppose it. These
are our neighbors, our relatives and members of our faith community -- women
and men whose belief in Jesus Christ draws them to receive his body and blood
time after time.
The church, increasingly committed to a consistent ethic promoting
the sanctity of life in all its stages, invites us to take another look at our
current conviction. One perspective draws on the instruction Jesus gave to his
disciples at the first Eucharist: Do this in remembrance of me. In
every circumstance of our lives we cry out for grace when we ask, What
ought we do in remembrance of Jesus -- in the light of his teachings and
example?
The same measure applies when we confront the murdered and the
murderers, the courts of law and the teachings of the church. What choice do we
make in remembrance of him?
In the summer of 1995 a young woman jogging in Central Park in New
York was murdered. The assailant was captured and the governor called for his
execution. The joggers mother, Linda Pinto Machado, came from Brazil to
claim her daughters body. Reporters engulfed her. They wanted her
reaction to Gov. George Patakis vision of justice for her daughters
murderer.
Mrs. Machado recoiled at the suggestion that he be executed.
Anyone who would commit such a crime, she said, was sick and in need of help.
To take such a persons life would desecrate her daughters memory.
She asked that the assailant be given the help he needed. This was the reaction
of a woman who had prayed aloud in Rio de Janeiro at the start of her sad
journey, God be with us. She carried the God of the living into New
York where elected officials were opting for death.
Mrs. Machados reaction is very much in line with that of
much of the civilized world. As matters stand, the United States is the only
country among Western industrialized nations that employs capital punishment.
For the second year in a row, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights -- over the
objections of the United States -- has voted in favor of a worldwide moratorium
on capital punishment.
Numerous reputable studies cite the uneven and unethical
application of legally sanctioned executions. These include their use against
the impoverished, the mentally defective and youthful offenders. Many of us are
unaware of these truths. We know more about capital punishment as it is meted
out to criminals who rationally and coldly plan the murders of others.
On the most logical of levels, it makes no sense for judge and
jury who, presumably, are not mentally defective, drug-crazed or in the throes
of passion, to do what the murderer did: To conspire to take anothers
life. Only the crime of murder seeks like behavior. The jury does not order the
thief robbed or the rapist raped.
Pope John Paul II, whose visits to the United States have been
celebrated and televised, has intervened on behalf of prisoners awaiting
execution. No state has paid any attention at all to his pleas. On Aug. 14,
Zane Brown Hill became the 473rd person executed in the United States since the
Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976.
The Holy Father has clarified Catholic teaching on this matter.
With incarceration as a way to prevent the killer from committing further
murders, the church holds that no grounds exist to justify capital
punishment.
No one can overstate the value of a single life or the evil of a
murder. The life of every person, whether innocent or sinful, is sacred, not
because of personal merit or demerit but because the creator and source of all
life is sacred.
Jesus, who invites us to choose our actions in remembrance of him,
warns us not to be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul.
Fear him, rather, who can destroy both body and soul in hell
(Matthew 10:26-27).
We would do well to fear our ability to disguise vengeance as
justice. We would do well to recognize the temptation of allowing those who
take innocent lives to rob us of our Christian spirit.
During the trial of a South Carolina woman who drowned her two
young sons, a billboard on a major Staten Island thoroughfare personified one
mans thirst for vengeance. An extended arm held the severed head of Susan
Smith. In large black letters next to the painting were these words:
Susan Smith murdered her two babies. I say cut her @&*#!* head
off.
Beneath the billboard three women and two men held a statement
that read: Hatred and revenge destroy the human spirit.
Which message is better proclaimed in remembrance of Jesus?
Mercy Sr. Camille DArienzo is president of the Brooklyn
Regional Community of the Sisters of Mercy, president of the Leadership
Conference of Women Religious, a religion commentator for WINS-radio, professor
emerita of Brooklyn College and the founder of the Cherish Life Circle, a group
that circulates a Declaration of Life card stating that should the individual
holding the card be murdered, the death penalty should not be given to his/her
murderer.
National Catholic Reporter, October 9,
1998
|