Book challenges Nobel Prize winners
autobiography
By NCR STAFF
A report by a U.S. anthropologist claims that Rigoberta
Menchú, the 1992 Nobel Peace Prize winner, fabricated key details in her
autobiography.
The details of David Stolls book, Rigoberta Menchú
and the Story of All Poor Guatemalans, were described in the Dec. 15 New
York Times. After nearly a decade of archival research and interviews with
more than 120 people, Stoll concluded that Menchús 1983 book,
I, Rigoberta Menchú, cannot be the eyewitness account it
purports to be because the indigenous Quiché activist repeatedly
recounts experiences she never had herself.
The New York Times also conducted interviews with
relatives, neighbors, friends and former classmates and teachers of
Menchú, who said that main episodes in her autobiography were fabricated
or exaggerated.
Interviewees said that the land dispute central to the book was a
family feud between Menchús father and his in-laws and not a fight
against wealthy landowners of European descent.
A younger brother, Nicolás, whom Menchú, now 39,
said she watched die of starvation, was actually an older brother, who is still
alive. Nicolás Menchú said the family had two sons who died of
hunger and disease before he was born in 1949.
Another brother that Menchú said she and her parents
watched being burned alive by army troops was kidnapped, turned over to the
army and shot when the family was not present, Nicolás Menchú
told the Times.
Menchú said in the first page of her book that I
never went to school. However, the Times interviewed four nuns
affiliated with the Order of the Sacred Family who recalled Menchú as a
gifted student at the school the order operated. They said she completed the
equivalent of the first year of junior high school.
Because she spent much of her youth in boarding school, she could
not have been working as an underground political organizer or spent up to
eight months a year working on coffee and cotton plantations, as described in
great detail in her book.
Menchú refused to comment for the Times article.
However, in a September interview, she dismissed Stolls criticisms as
part of a racist political agenda intended to gain publicity.
Geir Lundestad, director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute, told
the Times that he was aware of the Stoll book but said, there is no
question of revoking the prize, which was not based exclusively or
primarily on the autobiography.
In his book, Stoll said that Menchú drew on common
experience in Guatemala. By presenting herself as an everywoman, she has
tried to be all things to all people in a way no individual can be, Stoll
wrote.
He told the Associated Press, Theres more at issue
here than another celebrity embroidering her story. The way that you can
justify her story if you want to is that it was a crisis situation and she
wouldnt have gotten the attention that she did had she told her own
story, or if she said, These are things Ive heard have happened to
other people.
National Catholic Reporter, December 25,
1998
|