Viewpoint Sanctity of life demands no
compromise
By CHARLES J. CHAPUT
At its best, politics is a means of
ensuring justice both for the community and the individuals who comprise it.
Translated into daily life, though, politics often boils down to the art of the
possible; the art of the deal in pursuit of the ideal. It requires an ability
to give and take for maximum benefit, and therefore pragmatism, rightly
employed, is necessary to our life as a free people.
No democracy works without compromise. But neither does it work
without core principles that must not be brokered away. And this is why, when
compromise and pluralism serve as an excuse for abandoning the struggle over
certain jugular issues, politics can also end in a kind of sickness of the
spirit.
For the past 26 years, thanks to the Supreme Court and a
generation of bad moral reasoning, we Americans have exercised absolute power
over the unborn child -- not just the childs life and death but the very
definition of the childs personhood and humanity. We dont have a
right to this power. It belongs only to God. We took it by judicial coup in Roe
and subsequent court rulings, and like the sorcerers apprentice, we now
must deal with consequences we never imagined or intended.
Roe violated the fundamental principle that undergirds our
nations founding: the right to life. Trickling through our legal system
for nearly three decades, the ruling is now eroding the foundation on which we
base our entire understanding of the sanctity of the human person. The more
than 30 million U.S. abortions since 1973 are simply the most obvious
damage.
This erosion is what makes John Paul IIs encyclical
The Gospel of Life (Evangelium Vitae) so urgent in the
context of American politics. It also provides the framework for understanding
the U.S. bishops recent pastoral statement, Living the Gospel of
Life: A Challenge to American Catholics.
Americans arguably enjoy the greatest democratic experiment in
history. We clearly enjoy the fruits of extraordinary global influence and
economic power. But we are undermining our own survival by betraying our first
principle -- protection for the right to life.
As scripture says, a house cannot stand divided against itself. We
cannot take comfort in better health, education and nutrition programs for some
children while we allow the systematic termination of others. And too many of
our leaders, including Catholic officials who should know better, have been too
easily dissuaded from doing much about it, in the name of a distorted right to
privacy and an even more defective appeal to pluralism.
There is no more misleading argument in the current American
political lexicon than, Im personally opposed to (choose the
issue), but ... Some things are always and gravely wrong -- so wrong
that no excuse, no matter how reasonable-sounding, will suffice.
Direct attacks on human life like abortion and euthanasia can
never be excused by majority will or pro-rated away by other policies of social
concern. And real pluralism demands that people of conviction will work
legally, peacefully, ethically -- but forcefully and tirelessly -- to advance
their beliefs in the public square, in our courts and in our legislative
chambers.
Its hard to find virtue in compromise when someone weak dies
in the deal. Our laws, after all, like our art, music, literature and
architecture, are a window on our soul. They embody who we are. Surely Catholic
lawmakers can be encouraged and expected to understand the difference between
an unthinking worship of choice and the meaning of real freedom, which draws
its life from unchanging truths about the sanctity of the human person. If they
dont, we bishops do them no service by remaining silent or discreet out
of false prudence.
Elected officials offer the community their greatest contribution
when they cultivate and remain true to enduring moral principles. Character
counts. Political leaders who defend the sanctity of life are winners. And even
if the cost is sometimes defeat, there are worse things than losing an
election: Losing ones soul is among them. Its a thought that all of
us -- bishops, elected officials and voters -- will reflect on with equal
profit.
Abortion and euthanasia are by no means the only human dignity
issues that require Catholics attention. Respect for human life requires
active, untiring efforts on behalf of those who are poor, homeless, hungry or
politically marginalized. The sanctity of the human person is a seamless
garment and a consistent ethic or it is no ethic at all. I take great pride in
the Catholic people and bishops of Colorado for speaking out strongly against
the death penalty before and since executions resumed in our state in 1997.
But Living the Gospel of Life is a reminder that some
sanctity-of-life issues -- those that involve the right to life itself -- are
foundational. In the calculus of public policy, they must come first. Catholic
voters and elected officials who ignore this build the moral architecture of
our culture on sand.
Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Denver is a member of the
Capuchin Franciscans.
To read Evangelium Vitae on the Vatican's Web
site, click the link below to access www.vatican.va Click The
Holy See for English, click The Holy Father, then click John Paul
II, and, finally, click Encyclicals. Scroll down to find
Evangelium Vitae and click on that.
National Catholic Reporter, January 29,
1999
|