Cover
story
Comparisons to Hitler evocative but logically unsound, critics
say
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff
In the back of the mind of every
Western leader since World War II, every president or prime minister who has
hesitated to send troops into battle, must lurk the image of Neville
Chamberlain.
It was Chamberlain who as prime minister of England flew off to
Munich in 1938 to negotiate peace in our time with Adolph Hitler.
That peace proved illusory, and Hitler has since become the stock refutation of
the pacifist position in the Western mind.
Perhaps inevitably, supporters of the NATO air campaign in
Yugoslavia have called Milosevic another Hitler and have evoked
memories of the Holocaust in referring to the suffering of the Kosovar
Albanians.
Critics of the Hitler analogy, however, make two points: that by
comparing every new bully to Hitler, we lose sight of the unique features of a
conflict; and that even in considering World War II, theres a case to be
made for nonviolent alternatives.
Hitler has become a metaphor for all vicious acts waged
against defenseless people everywhere, Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich
told NCR.
The problem with using Hitler that way is that it defeats
logical analysis. It doesnt require us to think anymore. In our haste to
destroy the image of Hitler, we end up killing a lot of innocent
people.
Progressive historian Howard Zinn agrees. Its a very
long jump from Hitler trying to take over Europe to Milosevic trying to hold
onto a corner of his own country, Zinn said. I think we need to
focus on the specific features of each situation rather than inflammatory
historical comparisons.
Longtime peace activist Karl Meyer believes, too, that American
national mythology has misread the lessons of World War II -- that violence,
rather than being the only option in response to Hitlers reign, may in
fact have prolonged it.
We tend to believe that the war stopped the Holocaust,
Meyer said. It did not -- the Holocaust happened. To say that any
strategy that contributed to the deaths of 6 million Jews, 40 million people
total, worked is a serious mistake.
A nonviolent response, early on and systematic, could well
have averted the depths of the tragedy.
What kind of response? The key is to realize that people
like Hitler are psychological anomalies, a minority, Meyer said. So
you go around him to the people.
Dont talk to them by pointing weapons at them. The
world community should have said to the Germans early on, were not going
to be your enemies. We should have taught people the German language so we
could talk to soldiers who crossed borders, we should have broadcast on radio
and on billboards that we will not engage in violence, that we will talk out
our differences, Meyer said.
If the countries surrounding Germany had done that, a
dictator with a conscripted army would not dare to send his army into such a
situation.
Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of Detroit agreed that
nonviolence would have been a more effective response. If we had walked
into Germany as nonviolent resisters, unarmed, that would have stopped the
death camps earlier.
The truth is our leaders werent interested,
Gumbleton said. The West refused to accept Jewish refugees, and we
didnt make the camps military targets until well after we knew about
them.
Gumbleton said he believes the Hitler analogy is only selectively
invoked. As long as were drawing parallels to the Jews of Europe,
why dont we show our people TV images of Mayan Indians whose villages
have been scorched and family members killed by paramilitaries we supported
over three or four decades? This is just blatantly hypocritical.
Kucinich said that while the world must never forget Hitler,
its time to stop invoking him as a talisman to ward off criticism of
military engagement.
As we move into a new millennium, we have to be careful in
our desire to extinguish the specter of Hitler we do not replace it with
something quite dreadful, Kucinich said, which is this instinctive
rush to violence every time some new threat comes on the scene.
National Catholic Reporter, June 18,
1999
|