Vatican offers symbols of harmony
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff Rome and Assisi, Italy
Symbols sometimes go where words cannot -- or dare not -- follow,
and for advocates of détente among the worlds religions, a
Vatican-sponsored summit of spiritual leaders Oct. 24-28 produced some
remarkable symbolism.
When a Hindu woman took John Paul IIs hand and pressed it
tenderly to her cheek during a glitzy concluding ceremony on the steps of St.
Peters, or when Nigerian Cardinal Francis Arinze processed into the
Basilica of St. Francis in Assisi alongside Buddhist priests and Muslim imams,
as soaring organ music filled the air, the imagery seemed to hint at a new
phase in the quest for religious unity.
How much substance lies beneath the symbols, however, remains to
be seen.
Because the summit deliberately avoided the most contentious
issues dividing the worlds religions, it was unclear how these gestures
would actually affect relations. Plans for follow-up were left similarly fuzzy.
It was also never clarified how a commitment to interreligious
progress can be reconciled with the Vaticans recent track record of
censuring theologians who offer positive treatments of religious pluralism.
Arinzes Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue
sponsored the four days of talks for 230 representatives of 20 religions,
including indigenous groups from America, Africa and Asia (though 98 Christians
formed almost half of the participants, with 71 of them Catholics). Delegates
came from 48 countries.
Most of the time was spent in small groups organized by language.
There were eight groups in English and two in French.
The event was styled as a successor to a gathering of spiritual
leaders convoked by John Paul II in Assisi in 1986. That event, however, was a
day of prayer for peace; this was intended as a working session for people
involved in interreligious dialogue. Three days were spent in Rome. The
pilgrimage to Assisi came on Oct. 27, the anniversary of the 1986
gathering.
Thorn in the flesh
The assembly ended with a common declaration rejecting
fanaticism, extremism and mutual antagonisms which lead to violence
-- a statement with obvious relevance in light of conflicts from Chechnya to
the Sudan in which religion plays a role.
Participants agreed that resisting extremism is among the core
challenges facing mainstream religious bodies. Fundamentalism will be the
thorn in the flesh of the third millennium, said Judith Mbula Bahemuka, a
Catholic from Kenya.
Despite repeated invocations of the spirit of Assisi,
a shadow from the 1986 gathering hung over the assembly. That day had been
bitterly criticized by Catholic traditionalists, and even some members of the
Roman curia, on the grounds that it seemed to place all religions on the same
level -- that it gave the appearance of relativism and even
syncretism, the blending of elements of different religious
traditions.
At the time, in a rare public break with the pope, Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, the Vaticans top doctrinal officer, said of the 1986
gathering, This cannot be the model.
Vatican officials went to great lengths to avoid similar
controversy this time. Arinze stressed that delegates were to leave aside
speculative discussion, that listening was the prime
objective. Participants would not pray together, Arinze insisted, because
prayer depends on what you believe, and we do not believe the same
things.
Officially, journalists were discouraged from even going to Assisi
to witness the pilgrimage, though most reporters made the trip.
Instead of prayer, there was a joint moment of silence
in front of St. Francis tomb in Assisi -- and TV cameras and still
photographers were blocked from the area lest images of anything that looked
like common prayer be beamed around the world.
Even these precautions were not enough to prevent the Society of
Pius X, the group that formed around schismatic Latin Mass champion Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre, from staging a day of reparation for the assembly,
concluding with eucharistic adoration in a Roman church. The group called it a
blasphemy that the pope had called together representatives of
20 false religions.
The effort to avoid controversy frustrated some participants.
The conversations were really not very deep, to be honest, said
Mohammad Sammak, a scholar and chair of a Christian/Muslim dialogue in Beirut,
Lebanon.
The meeting is trying to do the right things, but I wish it
would have been more concrete and to the point, he said. Sammak served as
a special representative to the special synod of bishops on Lebanon in
1995.
The interreligious gathering came just after the close of the Oct.
1-23 European Synod, where some speakers voiced alarm about rising levels of
Muslim immigration. One warned of the possible Islamicization of
Europe. Though the assembly did not address these fears, they were clearly on
the minds of Muslim delegates.
This idea of Europe becoming Islamicized is an
exaggeration, said Kamel Al-Sharif, former minister of Islamic affairs
for the government of Jordan. Immigrants are coming into Europe to find
work, not to spread Islam.
Both Sammak and Al-Sharif spoke in interviews with NCR.
Al-Sharif said support for better Muslim-Christian relations has
gained ground in recent years in the Islamic world. When we first
started, our own friends would ridicule us, would say that we have sold out
Islam to sit down with the infidels. Now these same people want to sit down
with us, he said.
The mainstream within Islam is for dialogue rather than
confrontation, Al-Sharif said. But we cannot pretend that other
views, on both sides, do not exist.
Sammak said that Europes Muslim immigrants tend to become
more militant than they were in their native countries. The Turks who are
going into Germany forgot theyre Muslims at home, but when they get to
Europe the first thing they want to do is build a mosque, he said.
Sammak said that Muslims have little experience living as a
minority. The laws of Islam are based on Muslims being the rulers,
he said. It will take time for immigrants to sort out how they can
maintain their religious identity in harmony with their neighbors.
Despite the tensions created by migration, Al-Sharif said Europe
has an obligation to find ways to respond positively.
One should not forget that these are the old colonial
powers, who are largely responsible for the situations in Algeria, in
Africa, Sharif said. Its a matter of justice for them to
carry some of the burden.
The Latin-rite bishop of Tripoli, Giovanni Martinelli, told
reporters that he disagreed with a bishop from Turkey who voiced fears about
Islam at the European Synod. I fear the Christians who dont live in
a Christian way in the Muslim countries more than I fear the Muslims,
Martinelli said.
One often-voiced complaint about Islam from Christians is about
reciprocity -- meaning that Islamic nations should permit the same
religious freedom found in Western nations. Arinze raised the issue in his
intervention at the European Synod.
Al-Sharif said Westerners must understand that the demand for
reciprocity cuts both ways. In Jordan, there is a former foreign minister
who is a Christian. When it came Jordans turn to chair the World Muslim
Congress, this man, a Christian, became chair of the Muslim Congress,
Sharif said.
Claiming Christians
At this time he took part in a Muslim delegation to the
Vatican, and I remember him asking the pope and the cardinals: When will
we see a similar kind of tolerance in Western nations? There are no
Muslim ministers in European governments, even though there are many qualified
for the jobs, Al-Sharif said.
Sammak voiced annoyance at the way Christian leaders in the West
sometimes claim Christians in the Middle East whenever disputes
between Christians and Muslims arise. These people are not Westerners,
they are part of the Middle East, and their future is part of the future of the
Middle East itself, Sammak said. The Europeans and Americans should
not exploit situations to drive wedges between us.
Both men said that only in Saudi Arabia are severe restrictions
imposed on the practice of other religions -- and that the policy has it
origins in the sacred status Muslims accord to the Arabian Peninsula.
Al-Sharif said the peninsula has a status for Muslims similar to
Vatican City for Catholics. You dont see any mosques inside the
Vatican, he said.
He added that the Saudi government is aware that the
countrys tiny Christian population does hold services in house churches,
and it tolerates the practice.
Sammak said he thinks the Saudis should be more accommodating.
The prophet even invited Christians to pray inside his own mosque,
he said. I dont see why they shouldnt be allowed to build
churches.
Sammak said that while the interreligious assembly had generated
some new friendships, it left the big questions hanging.
Likewise, the assembly skirted the most contentious issue
currently facing the Catholic/Jewish relationship: the possible beatification
of Pope Pius XII, whose role during World War II remains deeply controversial.
One Jewish delegate told NCR that the debate over Pius was
a side issue in the relationship. Only in the media do you
hear about it, said Ron Kronish, an American-born rabbi who runs an
interreligious group in Israel.
For other Jewish participants, however, the controversy over Pius
was very much alive.
I do not believe it serves the interests of the Roman
Catholic church to proceed with this beatification, said David Sobel,
rabbi of the largest synagogue in São Paolo, Brazil. Beatifying
the pope of silence, instead of condemning the omission that helped lead to the
annihilation of millions of Jews, would be to close ones eyes to the
truth, Sobel said.
Sobel, who pulled two journalists aside in Assisi to make his
statement, called the debate over Pius a matter of grave moral
implications.
We cannot look forward without looking back, Sobel
said.
Another Jewish leader at the assembly told NCR that he
believes that the Vatican understands how Jews would react to the beatification
of Pius XII, and for that reason the effort will not go forward.
Pius XII and sainthood
I have this on the authority of decision-makers in the
Vatican, said Sigmund Sternberg, an English businessman and a longtime
veteran of interreligious dialogue. Sternberg is among only a handful of Jews
to hold papal knighthoods (he is a knight commander of St. Gregory; his wife is
the only Jewish dame of St. Sylvester).
The Vatican cannot issue denials every time someone
reports that beatification is imminent, Sternberg said. But as with the rumored
beatification of Queen Isabella of Spain -- under whose authority Spanish Jews
were forcibly converted -- Sternberg says he is confident the Vatican will not
proceed.
Sternberg was involved in the negotiations in 1988 that led to the
removal of hundreds of small crosses from Auschwitz. I was told the army
and the police would never do it, he said. These things take time,
but the Vatican is listening.
He said that Catholic/Jewish relations have never been
better.
Sternberg said, however, that if the Vatican did proceed, it would
be harmful for relations with Jews. Pius could have saved the
Jewish community in Rome, Sternberg said. I do not believe it would
be justified to beatify him.
Though five Hindu delegates from India were present, the assembly
did not address the popes trip to India (scheduled for Nov. 5 and 6) to
present the concluding document from the 1998 Synod for Asia. The visit has
been bitterly criticized by Hindu nationalists who charge that Christians are
coercing poor Indians into conversion.
The resentment in India has spilled over into violence, as several
Christian clergy -- including Catholic priests and nuns -- have been beaten,
harassed or murdered in recent months. Australian Protestant missionary Graham
Staines and his two sons (ages 8 and 10) were burned alive in their jeep in
early 1999.
Several Hindu groups have published demands in newspapers that the
pope declare that following Jesus Christ was not the only means toward
salvation. They also demanded the pope ban conversions and apologize for the
killings and forced conversions in Indias Portuguese colonies of the 16th
century. Many Hindus were outraged when the U.S. Southern Baptist church
recently published 40,000 prayer books that lobby for funds to convert Indians
lost in the hopeless darkness of Hinduism.
The only mention of the papal trip came during the concluding
ceremony, when Hindu delegate Usha Mehta departed from her prepared text to add
two final points. She asked forgiveness on behalf of all Indians for
gruesome violence against Christian missionaries by some misguided
Indians, and she said all Indians would deliver a hearty and
cordial welcome to the pope in November.
Despite the effort to steer clear of potential flash points,
participants were able to agree on a call for greater interreligious
collaboration. They asked world leaders to work to eradicate poverty and
pledged to seek forgiveness for past wrongs committed in the name of
religion.
Lady Rosalind Preston, a Jewish delegate from England, spoke of
the need for a healing of memory about sins committed in the name
of religion.
Delegates emphasized the need for education about religions. They
pledged to encourage the media to report religious issues responsibly and to
work to ensure that textbooks offer balanced presentations of religious
subjects.
Exactly how these statements would be translated into action was
not clarified. English Bishop Michael Fitzgerald, Arinzes secretary at
the Council for Interreligious Dialogue, told reporters there was no plan for
another meeting like this one. Instead, he encouraged local groups involved in
dialogue to continue this movement in various ways.
Kenyas Mbula Bahemuka said that if there is to be another
summit of religious leaders, it should be held outside Europe. A
conference like this in a Third World country would make a much bigger impact
than in Rome, she said.
No discussion of disciplined Jesuit
The taboo within the assembly on controversial matters extended
not only to disputed points between the religions, but also to
Catholicisms own self-understanding.
Several Catholic theologians who work in the area of religious
pluralism have become the objects of doctrinal investigations in recent months,
most notably Belgian Jesuit Fr. Jacques Dupuis of Romes Gregorian
University.
Though the Vatican has not officially revealed the grounds for the
Dupuis review, sources in Rome say Ratzingers office believes that Dupuis
sacrifices too much of Christs uniqueness in order to claim that the
Eternal Word is active in other religions.
Retired Cardinal Franz König of Austria, an expert in
interreligious relations who helped draft Nostra Aetate, warned the
congregation that its treatment of Dupuis threatened to cast a chill over the
entire dialogue process.
Arinze rejected suggestions of conflict between hosting summits
for religious leaders and disciplining theologians who affirm pluralism.
There is no mixed message, except for those who have not
studied carefully what the theological discussion is, Arinze said at a
Vatican news conference, in response to a question from NCR.
Theology motivates and directs our action. It must be based on good
theology.
Arinze declined to comment on the Dupuis case. He seemed annoyed
at the question, saying, its not fair, its not right
for him to speak about a specific theologian.
The style of dialogue in the life of the church is something
new, something really started by John XXIII, Arinze said. So
theological investigation has some distance to cover. This means that none of
us has all the answers.
Despite the deliberate ambiguity about what comes next, as well as
the decision not to engage tough questions, organizers of the assembly said
that the very act of bringing people together had value. Standing in St.
Peters Square Oct. 28 for the concluding ceremony, one did have the sense
of something exceptional happening.
The soundtrack for the evening came from Gen Rosso, a
youth-oriented, multi-lingual rock band connected with the Focolare movement.
The group had composed a snappy number called Vive! for the event,
which they belted out several times. During the last reprise, the crowd roared
approval as a Jewish choir made up of cantors sporting tuxedoes and
yarmulkes started to clap and sway along to the beat.
At one point several thousand people held small candles aloft, and
as the light bounced off the cobblestones, the square literally seemed to
shimmer with good will. (The moment of silence was robbed of some of its magic,
however, as dozens of Italys wildly popular cellular phones repeatedly
broke through the quiet).
In the end, perhaps the symbolism made its own statement.
The church has to be a church in dialogue, Bishop
Michael Fitzgerald, secretary of the Council for Interreligious Dialogue, told
NCR. We have to be concerned with the whole of humanity, thus
including people of different religious beliefs. We have to acknowledge one
another, respect one another and live peacefully together.
Thats what this is all about.
National Catholic Reporter, November 12,
1999
|