EDITORIAL A moment of healing for the Christian
family
Mahatma Gandhi once said the problem
with Christianity is that it has never been tried. Its a point that
applies with special force to Jesus prayer, preserved in the Gospel of
John, that his followers may all be one.
Over the centuries, Christianity has seen so many schisms and
ruptures that a flow chart of church history would look like a process of
cellular division. The common Christian family that Jesus intended is badly
broken.
Every Christian is, in that sense, a child of divorce.
Even those of us (undoubtedly the majority) who long ago abandoned
the battle lines, who have made our separate peace with one another, still feel
the pain of partition. We long for unity, just as the world longs to see us
united, so badly does it thirst for examples of how difference does not have to
mean division.
Herein lies the importance of the joint agreement signed by
representatives of the Roman Catholic church and the Lutheran World Federation
in Augsburg, Germany, on Oct. 31 -- the 482nd anniversary of the day Martin
Luther is said to have nailed his 95 theses to the door of Wittenberg
Cathedral.
Admittedly, the subject matter of the agreement -- the doctrine of
justification, or how God saves the human person -- is no longer one that stirs
the passions of people in the pews. Most Christians, in fact, cannot help but
look at the faith versus works debate as a tempest in a theological teapot.
The agreement does not even declare agreement on all the nuances.
It admits that the two churches harbor different understandings of many key
concepts, such as the Lutheran notion of simul iustus et peccator --
that the human person is simultaneously justified and yet remains a sinner.
What the document does, and this is why the Lutheran/Catholic
joint agreement is the crown jewel of the post-Vatican II ecumenical movement,
is to say what most of us have long felt in our hearts: That these differences
are not enough to divide us, that the old anathemas are null and void.
This agreement is the product of decades of painstaking
theological work. Quite often those engaged in the dialogue were told their
energy was misplaced, that they were concerned with arcana that no longer
matter in the late 20th century. They deserve thanks for their perseverance.
Healing a relationship -- even when it means revisiting a now-remote past -- is
never a trivial pursuit.
As a practical matter, the joint agreement should be of enormous
value in parishes and congregations all over the world, wherever Lutherans and
Catholics rub shoulders. Pastors can now cite an official declaration of the
highest authorities in both churches, stating that whatever disagreements
remain are between brothers and sisters in the faith, not between warring camps
accusing each other of heresy.
Given that almost one-quarter of Catholic marriages every year are
to non-Catholics (a percentage that reflects only on the books
marriages, not unions formed without official church approval), this sort of
agreement should be of real comfort to many families.
But even more fundamentally, what happened in Augsburg moves the
Christian family closer to being whole. It means a family of faith that is more
united, thus more credible in proposing unity to a world ever more menaced by
tribalism.
It is critically important that the momentum generated in Augsburg
not dissipate. To that end, the Christian churches of Europe should embrace the
draft Charta Ecumenica that emerged out of the 1997 Ecumenical Assembly
in Graz, Austria. Cosponsored by the (Protestant) Conference of European
Churches and the (Catholic) Council of European Bishops Conferences, the
text presents the core principles that must guide ecumenical progress. The two
bodies have invited comment from local churches over the next year, and it is
vital that Christians seize the moment.
Equally important, ecumenical experts in the United States and
elsewhere should study the Charta Ecumenica to see if, with minor
adaptations, it could also serve as a focal point for conversations in their
own countries. As the draft puts it: There is no alternative to
reconciliation and ecumenism. (The draft can be found on the NCR
Web site, www.natcath.org/NCR_Online/documents/index.htm).
What happened in Augsburg was healing on a grand scale. That is
why it is so welcome -- and why the work must not stop.
National Catholic Reporter, November 12,
1999
|