EDITORIAL What do we want for all the
children?
Albert Camus cri di
couer on behalf of children is famous, in part because it was so often
repeated by the late Sen. Robert Kennedy. Camus said: Perhaps we cannot
prevent this world from being a world in which children are tortured, but we
can reduce the number of tortured children. And if you do not help us, who else
in the world can help us to do this?
Relatively few people recall, however, to whom the you
in the quote refers. Camus was addressing a group of French Dominicans in 1948
on the subject of The Unbeliever and Christians. He had been asked
to explain what unbelievers expect of Christians, and his answer was simple: to
join the fight for suffering humanity.
What I know -- which sometimes creates a deep longing in me
-- is that if Christians made up their minds to it, millions of voices --
millions, I say -- throughout the world would be added to the appeal of a
handful of isolated individuals who, without any sort of affiliation, today
intercede almost everywhere and ceaselessly.
This week, NCR is blessed to hear from two of those
isolated individuals, two crusaders, whose ceaseless interventions
on behalf of children issue a similar challenge to the Christian
conscience.
Arthur Jones offers a profile of Marian Wright Edelman, whose
leadership of the Childrens Defense Fund has made her a moral hero to
millions of Americans. Edelman told Jones she is fed up with seeking solutions
from within the political system.
It is time for the mothers and the grandmothers to say to
the men in power: Get out of the way. We will no longer permit the public
killing of our children. We will no longer talk of spending hundreds of
billions of dollars on Star Wars anti-missile systems when kids are dying like
flies. We will no longer see our children treated unfairly -- whether its
health care or child care, she said.
Edelman talks about launching a national movement, and she seems
willing to pay the political price. She said she is ready to challenge her
traditional allies, friends in education and health care more concerned with
maintaining their own employment than with shaking up institutions that are
obviously not educating children, not feeding them or making them well, not
lifting them out of poverty.
Like Edelman, author Jonathan Kozol has spent a lifetime demanding
that America repent its systemic neglect of children. The special education
issue on page 29 opens with a lengthy excerpt from Kozols new book,
Ordinary Resurrections.
In earlier works such as Death at an Early Age and
Savage Inequalities, Kozol exposed public education as the last form of
de jure discrimination in this country. As others talk about walking
across a bridge to the 21st century, Kozol has refused to forget that
educational policy in America is stuck in the 19th century -- our schools have
yet to catch up to the 1892 Plessy vs. Ferguson decision and its
doctrine of separate but equal. American public education, as it
stands, is both separate and unequal.
In his new work, Kozol strikes a gentler note, talking with
children about their religious beliefs. Yet without even trying, Kozols
book is, in its own way, an indictment. Knowing the beauty within these
children, the imagination and the verve and the passion that pulses in them,
how can we abandon them as we do? How can we allow them to attend urban schools
that are little more than warehouses, to go without medical care, to be gunned
down in a culture awash in weapons?
The American philosopher and educator John Dewey once said,
What the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the
community want for all its children. It is a noble ideal, and if Edelman
and Kozol are heard on a wide scale -- especially if we Christians add our
voices -- such an ideal could yet redeem our culture.
National Catholic Reporter, March 24,
2000
|