Catholic
Education Sooner or later, voucher programs will face scrutiny
By BARBARA MINER
Perhaps its my journalistic
training, but when someone refuses to give me what should be publicly available
information, I get suspicious.
Maureen Gallagher, director of Catholic Education for the
Milwaukee archdiocese, has consistently refused to release information to my
newspaper, Rethinking Schools, on the racial breakdown and test scores
at Catholic schools participating in a Milwaukee program under which low-income
children can use publicly funded vouchers to attend private schools.
My immediate reaction has always been what is she trying to
hide?
Vouchers are one of the hottest initiatives in education, and
voucher bills are expected in more than 20 states this spring. Currently,
Cleveland has a program similar to Milwaukees, and this fall Florida
began the first statewide voucher program. Because Milwaukees program was
the first, however, it remains a critically important test case for the
national vouchers debate (see Milwaukees experiment,
NCR, March 26, 1999).
The following is a cautionary tale for any religious school
thinking about entering the murky waters of public vouchers for private
schools.
Constitutional issues aside, such a relationship inherently opens
up questions of public accountability. If religious schools want
taxpayers dollars, they will have to realize that public dollars rarely
come without strings attached. One of the biggest strings is that the public
has a right not only to know how its tax dollars are being spent but also to
impose restrictions on such spending.
My ongoing correspondence with the Milwaukee archdiocese started
in the spring of 1999, when a researcher for Rethinking Schools asked
for information on the racial breakdown at Catholic voucher schools, including
the racial breakdown of the voucher students. The issue is of more than passing
interest, given the centrality of race to education politics in this city and
the not-too-well-disguised fact that, in some cases, Catholic schools have been
used by white parents to avoid desegregation efforts in the public schools.
Gallagher complained of not having enough time. When I told her
that we had the time and would compile the data from her records, she was
blunt: Are you kidding? she told me. We dont open our
files to anybody.
Last May, I heard through a well-placed source that the
archdiocese was worried because test scores at some of the voucher schools were
extremely low. In some cases, so the rumor went, the kids were doing worse than
their counterparts in the Milwaukee public schools.
Is this true? I dont know. But I wanted to find out. So I
sent another letter to Gallagher, asking for the test scores at archdiocesan
voucher schools, particularly those 16 schools where more than half the
students received vouchers.
This time Gallagher was equally blunt, although more formal. She
wrote that the archdiocese cannot provide you with the additional
information you requested. The Catholic schools, she wrote, are
accountable to the parents, to the church, and, as far the voucher funds go, to
the Department of Public Instruction.
In other words, the general public has no right to know how well
voucher kids are performing in the Catholic schools, even though the public is
paying their tuition.
Back in the days when private schools relied exclusively on
private tuition and donations, such arguments were valid. But when public
dollars are involved, and when the entire voucher program is premised on the
assumption that private schools are providing a superior education for
low-income children, the rules of the game have to be different. (This year,
there are roughly 8,100 students and 91 private schools, most of them
religious, taking part in Milwaukees publicly funded voucher
program.)
I find Gallaghers recalcitrance particularly curious given
that in 1991, the one time the archdiocese released even partially broken down
test scores, the findings showed that the gap in performance between white
students and African-American and Latino students in archdiocesan schools
mirrored that of the public schools.
This is not just a Catholic issue. Rethinking Schools sent
similar letters to all the voucher schools. As a group, however, the Catholic
schools stood out by their refusal to release information. Eight of the 10
Lutheran schools, for example, responded at least in part. Yet the Catholic
schools account for almost half of those receiving vouchers and have a
centralized bureaucracy that should be capable of providing basic data.
A recent report by the Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau provided
figures on the racial breakdown of students receiving vouchers, but not the
overall racial breakdown in voucher schools. Most Catholic schools also
provided some racial figures to pro-voucher researchers, listing white vs.
non-white percentages but failing to break down figures into categories of
African-American, Latino, Asian or Native American.
There are both educational and public policy concerns here. On an
educational level, if the private schools are providing a better education,
then it would be important to find out why -- and how public schools could
benefit from those findings.
But if low-income kids are not necessarily performing any better
-- and if, as any number of national studies show, a childs socioeconomic
status is the main determinant of how well they will perform on standardized
tests -- then vouchers are not going to be the magic bullet that will cure
educational woes.
Interestingly, those two Catholic schools that did return
information on racial breakdown heightened fears that the voucher program may
exacerbate segregation. One of the schools, Blessed Sacrament on the south
side, had only one African-American among its 200 students. At St.
Sebastians, located in a clearly multiracial neighborhood on the
citys west side, there were 26 African-Americans among its 446 students,
or only 6 percent. In comparison, at nearby Hi-Mount, a public neighborhood
school, 76 percent of the students were African-American in 1997-98.
Right now, private schools can thumb their noses at anyone in the
media or public who requests information. In fact, the 1995 legislation that
expanded the voucher program to include religious schools specifically
eliminated what were modest requirements that the schools report, at least to
the Department of Public Instruction, information on racial breakdown and test
scores. At present not even the state knows the racial breakdown or the test
scores at the voucher schools.
As a result, we have a voucher program that will eat up
potentially $75 million a year in public funds, and absolutely no requirements
to find out how well the schools are educating kids or how they may affect
racial segregation.
We live in an environment of get tough school
policies, with increasing requirements that public schools shape up and
be accountable. Why are the voucher schools exempted from
comparable scrutiny?
More important, how long do religious schools honestly think it
will be before the public starts asking similar questions and demanding that
religious voucher schools be accountable not only to their congregations but to
the public at large?
Barbara Miner is the managing editor of Rethinking
Schools, a grassroots education newspaper published in Milwaukee. It
is online at www.rethinkingschools.org
National Catholic Reporter, March 24,
2000
|