Movies A film at last does justice to Graham Greenes
vision
By ROBERT E. LAUDER
Blessings on Neil Jordan! For
various reasons, distinguished directors such as Fritz Lang, Carol Reed and
Otto Preminger could not pull off what Jordan has now accomplished: Hes
made an exciting film from a Graham Greene novel that captures not only its
setting but its substance.
In The End of the Affair, Jordan compellingly depicts
that strange milieu labeled by literary critics as Greeneland.
Its a dark, sleazy place populated by unattractive characters in flight
-- sometimes physical, sometime spiritual, often both. Yet other directors have
mastered that part of Greenes vision. Where Jordans film breaks new
ground is that it captures Greenes perspective on the mystery of the
divine, the Hound of Heaven, inexorably and relentlessly pursuing those who try
to protect themselves from the Pursuer.
In the best adventures in grace by the finest British novelist of
the 20th century, Greeneland and God play off one another; the more
nature and human beings seem forsaken, the more startling the appearance of the
supernatural.
That the quintessential Greene should have eluded filmmakers for
so long is uncommonly strange. No novelist since the birth of movies has been
more associated with films. Early in his career Greene wrote film criticism for
newspapers that was so good it has been gathered into a volume: Graham
Greene on Film: Collected Film Criticism, 1935-1939. He wrote two
screenplays based on material other than his own and seven screenplays, one of
which he co-wrote, based on his own writings.
If we group works that Greene called entertainments,
indicating their less-than-serious content and purpose, with his novels,
together they total 23 -- and 16 have been made into movies, two of them
twice.
In his excellent book Graham Greene: The Films of his
Fiction, Gene D. Phillips charts in detail Greenes long love affair
with film. Add to that the insistence of critics that Greenes literary
images are cinematic, that his prose is filled with vivid pictures of persons
and places, and we have to wonder why it has taken so long to get Greeneland
right on celluloid.
Of course, God is not as central to the entertainments
as he is to Greenes Catholic novels. Thus Fritz Lang, who brilliantly
captures Greeneland in 1943s The Ministry of Fear, cannot be
blamed for the absence of God. Alan Ladd in 1942s This Gun for
Hire and Charles Doyer in 1945s The Confidential Agent
likewise lack any relationship to the divine. In Carol Reeds black comedy
Our Man in Havana (1959) and George Cukors amusing
Travels with my Aunt (1972), any signs of the sacred are swamped by
the profane.
In terms of Greenes more serious works, Joseph
Mankiewiczs The Quiet American (1957), Peter Glenvilles
The Comedians (1967) and Otto Premingers The Human
Factor (1980) are based primarily on socio-political novels, and
thats how they appear on screen. But even films based on Greenes
Catholic novels often seem, from a religious standpoint, slight shadows of what
he wrote: 1947s The Fugitive, directed by John Ford and based
on The Power and the Glory; 1947s Brighton Rock, and
1953s The Heart of the Matter.
A film that was faithful to The Power and the Glory, in
which a whiskey priest fathers an illegitimate child, would never have gotten
past the Hollywood Production Code in 1947. So with The Fugitive,
Ford made a touching, visually striking film that bears almost no relation to
Greenes best novel. Brighton Rock, which boasts a screenplay
by Greene, fell into trouble with British censors who insisted that sections
about the faith of the 17- year-old murderer, Pinkie, might offend Catholics.
The Heart of the Matter leaves out the heart of the matter by
changing the suicide of Scobie into a killing, thus removing the key
theological question: Does Scobies suicide, done out of love, gain him
hell or heaven?
Closer to Greenes vision of God and the human person is
1957s Across the Bridge, made from a short story in which a
completely asocial thief played by Rod Steiger attains salvation by laying down
his life for his friend, the type of sacrifice Jesus claimed was the greatest
love someone could have (John 15:13). In Greenes novel, however, there is
theological paradox as salvation comes in strange ways -- the friend is a
dog!
Until Jordans recent movie, the best film adaptations of
Greene were The Fallen Idol (1948) and The Third Man
(1949). In both cases Greene wrote the screenplay. In both, Carol Reed captures
Greeneland brilliantly, but neither has a religious dimension. Greenes
original screenplay for The Third Man, when Holly Martins (Joseph
Cotton) confronts wartime profiteer Harry Lime (Orson Welles) about selling
defective penicillin that led to peoples deaths, the following dialogue
occurs:
Martins: You used to be a Catholic.
Lime: Oh, I still believe
in God and mercy and all
that. Im not hurting anybodys soul by what I do.
Its too bad the lines were cut, because they would have
given more depth to the evil in Lime. I think of Pauline Kaels
observation years ago that it is because of their Catholic background that
directors Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese convey such a strong sense
of sin and evil in their films.
The most faithful and effective film from one of the Catholic
novels had been Edward Dmytryks The End of the Affair (1954),
but that version seems flat, slow-paced and talky in comparison with
Jordans movie.
How do you film God? Not easily. Jordan, following Greenes
lead, focuses on God through the prism of erotic sexual love. What Greene did
in his novel, and what Jordan does in the film, is depict sexual love as a
movement toward divine love. In the films most dramatic moment Sarah
Miles (Julianne Moore), as she terminates her illicit love affair with Maurice
Bendrix (Ralph Fiennes), tells him that people can love without seeing one
another. She says, People love God all their lives without seeing him,
dont they? To Bendrixs objection, That is not my kind
of love, she replies, Maybe there is no other kind of
love.
That line, as much as anything in the drama, expresses the theme
of Greenes story and Jordans film.
In making a movie with a religious theme, a miracle is the easiest
type of reality to film, especially given contemporary special effects
technology. The mystery of divine presence is, and always has been, the most
difficult. The main character of Greenes novel The End of the
Affair, appearing on almost every page, is neither Sarah nor Bendrix but
God.
Jordan makes God the center of his film by using the mystery of
the plot -- why did Sarah terminate the affair? -- to lead us to the deeper
mystery. When Sarah announces to Bendrix that she has fallen into faith the way
she fell into love, we know that she has been caught by the Hound of Heaven. We
also suspect that Bendrix will not escape, no matter down what labyrinthine
ways he flees, that even his hatred of God will open up space for grace.
With The End of the Affair, Neil Jordan has provided
an especially rare blessing in our secular age. He has made a great religious
film -- and, thus, hes finally put Greeneland and God together on
screen.
Fr. Robert E. Lauder is a priest of the Brooklyn diocese and a
professor of philosophy at St. Johns University in Jamaica, N.Y.
National Catholic Reporter, April 14,
2000
|