Column Segregation, harassment mark Palestianian life
By ROSEMARY RADFORD
RUETHER
Most Americans link the term
apartheid only with South Africa, but this term is increasingly being
used by Palestinians and their supporters -- including many Israelis -- for the
policy of separation of Arab and Jewish populations that is guiding
Israels master plan for its settlement with the
Palestinians.
Apartheid in South Africa is a vivid memory for me. I
lived and taught in South Africa in 1989, months before the release of Nelson
Mandela from prison. During that period, the Defiance Campaign was
at its height. Groups of black South Africans, with help from anti-apartheid
whites, were challenging the many ways that blacks were kept as second-class
citizens. Martial law was still in force, and public protests of any kind were
banned. Arrests, often accompanied by severe beatings, were common for black
protesters and even for some white ones. I remember groups of my South African
friends marching in protest in Cape Town, led by Bishop Desmond Tutu and his
wife, only to be scattered by whip-wielding police that chased them through the
streets.
Among the activities of the Defiance Campaign were the intentional
mounting of white-only buses, taking sick people of color to white-only
emergency rooms and engaging in group picnics at white-only beaches. I
particularly remember the beach protests. Large groups would pack their lunch
baskets and take off for white-only beaches with the whole family. A South
African friend and I drove out to watch the events. We found the beaches
surrounded by troops. The nonviolent beach protesters with their children and
picnic baskets were being treated as if they were national security threat No.
1. The absurdity of apartheid had never been so evident, an effect that the
beach protesters intended.
These images of squadrons of armed troops blocking people from
going to the beach have been repeated in recent months in Israel. These
struggles have been documented by Israeli journalists, such as Suzanne
Goldenberg, an Israeli writer who lives in Tel Aviv. In the June 10 London
Guardian, she describes the natural impulse of many Palestinian Arabs, some
of whom live in and are citizens of Israel, to escape the sweltering heat of
summer days by a family excursion to the beautiful palm-dotted beaches of the
Mediterranean coast of Israel. However, as Israeli Jews were settling down for
a pleasant day at the beach, their fellow citizens who are Arab Palestinians
have been faced with a night in jail for following the same impulse.
Current government policy has been to enforce an apartheid policy
in beaches and recreation areas of Israel. In response to this policy, Tel Aviv
police were out in force this summer, detaining some Palestinian families
headed for the beach and driving others away. The enforcement of Jewish-only
beaches began in May and was vigorously enforced through the summer. Thousands
of Palestinians were detained, including children on school trips. Israeli
coach drivers faced charges under the Security Act.
Goldenberg tells the story of one such Palestinian family:
One East Jerusalem familys day at the beach ended in tears and a
fog of exhaust fumes at 10 a.m. yesterday when the police confiscated their
car, marooning them with their picnic basket on a traffic island on a busy
avenue. The family members, who were afraid to give their names, have the legal
right to travel anywhere in Israel. But when the police hauled them over for
the customary questioning of every Palestinian who dares to visit the beaches,
they discovered that the father owed 91,000 shekels in back taxes on his shop.
They seized his car and put his wife and two teenage children under armed guard
until a relative could arrive to ferry them home. Officially, they cannot
prohibit us from coming here, said the father. But they are
determined to harass us, even if we do have legal rights. They just dont
want us to be happy.
Since the beginning of the peace process in the
mid-80s, Israel has kept Palestinians penned into the crowded confines of
the West Bank and Gaza, barring most of them from travel out of their areas to
other Palestinian regions, especially East Jerusalem. A strict system of
workers permits prevents Palestinians in the territories from traveling
into Israel, except for those few workers who have menial jobs that Israelis
will not take. The number of Palestinians allowed such permits has steadily
fallen, and unemployment has grown in Gaza and the West Bank. It is estimated
that poverty has grown sharply and income fallen by half during these last
seven years.
Israeli Jews also are barred from visiting Gaza. Foreign travelers
who go to Gaza have their passports stamped and are closely interrogated and
even strip-searched when departing from Israel. I have experienced this kind of
treatment several times. Clearly the desire of the government is not to let
either Israelis or outsiders see the destitution of this most ghettoized and
impoverished area of what is claimed to be the core of a Palestinian
autonomous territory.
It appears that, as the date for a settlement between Israel and
the Palestinian Authority grows nearer, Israel is trying to create a complete
separation between Palestinians and Jews, within Israel and in the territories.
For example, in the Pisgat Ze-ev area of Jerusalem, the police routinely stop
Palestinian children playing in the park. In the central Israel town of Ranana,
the council recently barred non-residents from visiting the amusement park to
keep out Palestinian tourists. In the territories, there are hardly any
recreation facilities.
As always, the pretext for these measures of separation is
security. Police claim that they are enforcing the permit regulations to stop
potential terrorists from entering Israel. But even Palestinians who have
permits to be in Israel find themselves detained when they seek to take a dip
in the cooling waters of the ocean. Sometimes they are told to leave the
well-kept areas patronized by Jews and to swim in the rocky bay near the
largely Arab area of Jaffa. Some Palestinians leave meekly when ordered off the
beach, while others, such as some college students from Al-Quds University in
Jerusalem, have decided to test the law by returning several times.
The excessive bloodshed that has been inflicted on Palestinian
protesters in the wake of Ariel Sharons provocative visit to the Al Aqsa
mosque in Jerusalem makes abundantly clear what should have already been
obvious. The status quo created by Israeli apartheid policy toward the
Palestinians is completely unsustainable. It allows for no security for
Palestinians or ultimately for Israelis. It cannot be the basis for any
peace.
It is crucial for Americans and the world community generally to
understand the assumptions of the Israeli view of the peace
process. This plan essentially is to create small segregated areas in the
West Bank and Gaza that are internally under Palestinian rule, but are embedded
in a system of Israeli control that closes their borders at will and can
intervene within them at any time. The people in these segregated areas are
kept from adequate economic and cultural development and forbidden access to
the Israeli areas, except on limited permits for low-paying jobs.
The name for this system is not peace, but apartheid.
The sooner the American people and its politicians are clear about that the
sooner it will be possible to prevent this system from being set in stone,
necessitating a long struggle against it -- like the one in its final stages in
South Africa in 1989.
I suggest that the next time members of your church, synagogue,
mosque or school go to the Holy Land, you spend some time visiting
and hearing the stories of what daily life is like for Palestinians under
Israeli power. Maybe you can take a group of Palestinian families to the beach
or to an amusement park and see what happens.
Rosemary Radford Ruether is a professor of theology at
Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary, Evanston, Ill. Her e-mail address
is Rosemary.Ruether@nwu.edu
National Catholic Reporter, October 20,
2000
|