Disputed elections of a rather nasty
sort
By GARY MACY
Special to National Catholic Reporter
Editors note: Gary Macy says his article, as submitted,
contained 905 words, subject to a hand recount.
News reports tell us that this election year in the United States
is unparalleled in our history. As we struggle to decide how best to honor our
democratic traditions, Christians, as always, can take comfort in the past.
Disputed elections of a rather nasty and intractable sort have
occurred all too often in church history. Most bishops were chosen by the
people and clergy of their diocese right up until the end of the 19th century,
affording lots of room for contention. In the 14th century, for example, all
disputed elections of bishops were sent for adjudication to Rome (the effective
Supreme Court of Europe). And because most elections were disputed, Rome wound
up picking the winning candidate.
The process could take years in the really tough cases.
Disputes started early. Late in the second century, for instance,
debate over the relationship of God the Son to God the Father broke out in
Rome. A teacher in Rome about whom little is known, Sabellius, insisted that
the Father and the Son must be somehow identical or Christians would be stuck
believing in two gods.
Maybe, he suggested, the Father and the Son are just different
names for the same being.
Hippolytus, however, a presbyter of the Roman church, insisted
that the Father and Son must be separate persons and yet one God. Hippolytus
had considerable political capital. Highly thought of in his own time, he is
today considered one of the most important third-century theologians in the
Western church. The great Alexandrian theologian, Origen, stopped by to hear
his sermons while in Rome.
The debate about the relationship of the Father and Son was
already pretty heated when the Roman deacon Callistus tried to steer a middle
course between the two. While not accepting Sabellius teaching, Callistus
publicly denounced Hippolytus theology as ditheism.
Hippolytus had never liked Callistus and now he was furious.
Callistus, Hippolytus sneered, was not only a former slave, but (according to
Hippolytus) an embezzler who had been rescued from punishment only through the
intercession of the church.
Callistus was a bit of a celebrity, though, because he had been
banished to Sardinia by Roman officials for his Christian beliefs (a banishment
that resulted from Callistus own stupidity, according to Hippolytus) and
had returned to Rome a confessor -- that is, one who had been imprisoned for
the faith. His main job as deacon was supervising the new cemetery on the
Appian Way near a place called Catacumbus.
Hippolytus was appalled when Callistus was chosen bishop of Rome
in 217. Hippolytus sensibilities were further offended when Callistus not
only offered reconciliation to those who had fallen into sin after baptism, but
even recognized marriages between upper class women and men of lower social
status.
Hippolytus and his followers separated from Callistus in a huff,
and decided to declare their own leader. The separated Christian community
picked Hippolytus to fill the post that Callistus already filled: bishop of
Rome. Rome was thus split between two rival Christian communities, both of
which had chosen their own bishops. In effect, there were two popes.
Rome was divided not for weeks, but for years. Callistus died and
was replaced by Urban in 222. Hippolytus rejected and attacked Urban just as he
had Callistus. Urban died and was replaced by Pontianus in 230. Still
Hippolytus refused communion with the spiritual descendents of Callistus.
In 235, however, disaster struck both communities. Emperor Maximin
exiled both bishops to Sardinia for their roles as leaders of outlawed
Christians. Amazingly, suffering together seemed to have softened Hippolytus,
and it is likely that he was reconciled with Pontianus while they were in exile
together. At least it would seem so as the bodies of both Hippolytus and
Pontianus were returned to Rome with honor by Pope Fabian (236-50) and
Christians accepted both as martyrs. St. Hippolytus feast day is Aug.
13.
Christian history treats both candidates now with due
reverence.
Tradition considers Callistus the true bishop of Rome and accepts
both his teaching on confession and on marriage. Hippolytus, on the other hand,
is considered one of the most important contributors not only to the liturgy,
but also to the orthodox understanding of the Trinity.
Hippolytus most famous work, the Apostolic Tradition,
is one of the earliest witnesses Christians have to the liturgy of the early
Roman church. In return, Hippolytus congregation may have commissioned a
statue of him engraved with the names of his books. Centuries later, this
statue was dredged from the Tiber River and now greets scholars on their way
into the Vatican Library.
We can, perhaps, take some comfort from the fact the two rival
Roman camps were reconciled, even if it was under pressure of banishment. In
our country, too, we hope both sides will come together to face national
challenges, and tradition will record the virtues, and not just the vices, of
the two contenders.
(Just to set to the record straight, I am not recommending, as at
least one of my colleagues has hinted, that the United States might take a page
out of Roman Christian history here and banish the candidates.)
Of course, the granddaddy of all disputed elections was in 1378
when the same group of cardinals elected two popes, one in Rome and one in
Avignon. Two and then three popes all contended for rule of the church until
1415.
But then that is another story and we hope a precedent we will not
need to examine.
Gary Macy is a professor in the department of Theology and
Religious Studies at the University of San Diego.
National Catholic Reporter, December 8,
2000
|