EDITORIAL Harshness toward prisoners breeds
trouble
U.S. citizens are used to thinking
of themselves as champions of human rights. So it may be jarring to consider
the possibility that human rights abuses occur regularly, daily, in prisons
throughout the country, under the guise of maintaining law and order.
Prolonged use of solitary confinement, a U.S. invention once
largely abandoned, has made a comeback. As part of the
prison-building/harsh-sentencing craze sweeping the culture, solitary
confinement no longer causes us to cringe. Perhaps it is because we have gotten
beyond imagining the cruelty involved in locking up a human being in severely
cramped quarters for all but one or two hours of the day.
More likely, though, it is because we are unaware of what is being
done in the name of our safety. Whatever the reason, it must be known that what
is being done, under a number of international conventions, would be considered
a violation of human rights.
Prison is a grim and violent place. Technology now allows
punishment to go on with an absolute minimum of human contact. And the
prevalent mood in society allows punishment to go on virtually unnoticed,
tucked away in austere, remote concrete vaults.
What is taking place quietly on the American penal landscape --
more and more prisons, often built by for-profit companies to accommodate
harsher sentences dealt out with little judicial discretion allowed the sitting
judge -- provokes some striking moral questions.
Perhaps that is why the American bishops, with keen regard for the
victims of crime, nevertheless dared to venture into a tangle of issues that
easily could have remained out of sight and mind.
In a recently released statement on the issue titled
Responsibility, Rehabilitation and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective on
Crime and Criminal Justice, the bishops write: We bishops question
whether private, for-profit corporations can effectively run prisons. The
profit motive may lead to reduced efforts to change behaviors, treat substance
abuse and offer skills necessary for reintegration into the
community.
Those concerns are multiplied with the increased use of solitary
confinement, where prisoners are offered no hope of rehabilitation or
training.
Regardless of who runs prisons, we oppose the increasing use
of isolation units, especially in the absence of due process, and the
monitoring and professional assessment of the effects of such confinement on
the mental health of inmates.
What the bishops seek is nothing short of a fundamental shift in
attitude of the wider culture. But it is not for altruistic or religious
reasons alone that they preach a revamping of the penal system. It becomes
clearer each month and with each new cellblock constructed and each new
supermax that goes up in some rural setting that our prison system is not
working.
The most frightening practical aspect of the
lock-em-up-and-forget-em school of jurisprudence is the reality
that only a very few will remain locked up and forgotten for long.
The bishops argue that the immense amount of money now being spent
to build more prisons and increase security would be better invested in
programs to rehabilitate and train prisoners who eventually will be returning
to the general population.
Our society seems to prefer punishment to rehabilitation and
retribution to restoration thereby indicating a failure to recognize prisoners
as human beings, the bishops write.
In some ways, an approach to criminal justice that is
inspired by a Catholic vision is a paradox. We cannot and will not tolerate
behavior that threatens lives and violates the rights of others, they
write. At the same time, a Catholic approach does not give up on those
who violate these laws. We believe that both victims and offenders are children
of God. Despite their very different claims on society, their lives and dignity
should be protected and respected.
In the end, say the bishops, punishment must have two clear
purposes: protecting society and rehabilitating those who violate the law.
Right now, we are doing neither well. By refusing to spend money
training and rehabilitating, we are assuring a perpetual and growing population
of dangerous, unreformed ex-prisoners in our midst.
National Catholic Reporter, December 8,
2000
|