Books Death squads flourish where government represents interests of only
a minority
DEATH SQUADS IN
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: MURDER WITH DENIABILITY Edited by Bruce B. Campbell
and Arthur D. Brenner St. Martins Press, 364 pages,
$45 |
By GARY MacEOIN
As editors Bruce Campbell and Arthur Brenner note in the preface
of this book, most people associate death squads with Latin America. They
constitute, however, a more widely distributed phenomenon. In almost all cases,
they flourish in the context of a government that represents the interests of
only a minority of its people, a typical post-colonial situation. The
characteristic of such governments is that they must use force to repress
popular movements. Where such force openly identified with the government might
create internal or international problems, a death squad offers plausible
deniability.
While death squads as an instrument of public policy are usually
associated with weak states, the phenomenon is more extensive. The earliest
case cited in this book is the Ku Klux Klan, which was a secret society created
by former Confederate soldiers just after the Civil War. For nearly a century,
it conducted death-squad-like killings and other terrorist acts against freed
slaves and their descendants, as well as others thought to collaborate with the
agents of the victorious federal government. Also noted briefly are the private
detective and security guard firms that fought the nascent labor movement in
the United States from the middle of the 19th until well into the 20th century,
carrying out at times deliberate murders of labor organizers and union
members.
Another type of death squad developed in Germany after its defeat
in World War I. When the 1919 Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh restrictions
on German sovereignty, including limitations on its armed forces, groups came
together with government connivance to arm secretly. Death squads, some of them
formed within government agencies, soon emerged to dispose of anyone suspected
of revealing the illegal activities, helping to create an atmosphere that was
soon to facilitate the ascent of Hitler to power.
One premise postulated by the writers in this book is that
death squads are by definition appurtenances of modern states,
particularly of post-colonial states in which a minority monopolizes economic
and political power. Some states openly encourage them. An example cited here
is the Philippines during the Aquino presidency in the late 1980s when both the
military leaders and Aquino herself praised the anticommunist vigilantes who
were engaged in death-squad killings.
Even states in which public opinion would not tolerate the
activities of death squads within their own borders are often prepared to
collaborate with regimes they know are using death squads. Using U.S. official
documents declassified under the Freedom of Information Act, Cynthia Arnson
describes how the U.S. government in El Salvador financed and defended Roberto
DAbuisson and other death-squad leaders known to them as having planned
and ordered the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980. It was not
any change of heart but only the public revulsion in the United States caused
by the killing of six Jesuits and two women helpers almost a decade later that
forced a change of policy. U.S. complicity with regimes in other South and
Central American countries that encouraged death squads is also noted here.
The authors believe that death squads will proliferate in the 21st
century, as growing social imbalance tends to make states ungovernable. In this
area, as in so many others, they see states privatizing or
subcontracting the task of maintaining order without justice. Martha Huggins
writes, Death squads are part of a decentering of authority that, in all
market societies, grows out of a privatizing and commodifying of social
control.
The academic robes of several of the 11 authors are showing.
Almost 100 pages of notes (dispersed between chapters) and end matter do not
encourage the general reader. But the issue is an important and continuing one,
much closer to home than we think.
Gary MacEoins email address is
gmaceoin@cs.com
National Catholic Reporter, December 15,
2000
|