Viewpoint Loyalty within the clerical club matters most to Holy
Office
By EUGENE C. BIANCHI
I dont mean to say that
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger is a sadist or that he leads a band of inquisitors
who delight in punishing others. Nor do I want to sound like a whiny liberal
bemoaning the clericalism of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
But there is something odd about the procedure of the modern Holy Office in its
attempts to protect God from erroneous notions about the divinity and to
maintain its pure doctrine lest the faithful stray from the path of
salvation.
I thought about this as I pondered a statement from Fr. Paul
Collins, the controversial Australian writer and media personality, who
resigned from the priesthood in the midst of a long investigation by the
congregation (NCR, March 16). Collins, the author of Papal Power
and other works upsetting to the Vatican, said that he resigned at age 60 to
spare his religious order harassment by the congregation. He also spoke about
how the congregation did not allow him to face his accusers and similar issues
of due process.
As I read Collins explanation, I wondered if it was his
ideas that mattered most to the watchdogs of the congregation or his status as
a clergyman speaking those ideas. My guess is that once he is reduced to
the lay state, the congregation will quickly lose interest in his
erroneous ideas or their pernicious influence. They will turn their
inquisitorial attention to another cleric or perhaps a nun. Again, is it
theology that mainly interests the congregation or the churchly status of the
theologian? Notice that time after time it is clergymen who are investigated:
Frs. Charles Curran, Hans Küng, Jacques Dupuis and Roger Haight, to
mention just a few.
I dont want to bring the wrath of the congregation down on
my friend and esteemed colleague, Rosemary Radford Ruether, by using her as an
example of an outstanding lay theologian who has been ignored by the
congregation. But if one looked into the vast corpus of her written work, one
would find evidence of the same progressive, erroneous notions
about Vatican power, womens ordination, the place of Jesus interfacing
with world religions, and many other disquieting themes that produce cold
sweats in the halls of the SantUffizio. A compelling argument could be
made that Ruether, after 40 years of publishing and teaching, is not only the
world-respected dean of Catholic and Protestant women theologians, but she is
also a lay theologian who has had at least as much influence as some of the
well-known priest theologians and moralists like Frs. Edward Schillebeeckx and
Bernard Häring.
It makes one wonder why some are chosen for investigation and
others ignored. Is it really the ideas or the clerical status of the proponent?
Is it more a matter of loyalty within the clerical club, of not overturning the
ashtrays in the old boys club and leaving wet rings on the dark wood arms of
the overstuffed furniture? NCRs own John L. Allen Jr. looked up at
me over a plate of steaming pasta last fall in Rome to say that if one writes
as a Catholic layperson (we were discussing his critical biography, Cardinal
Ratzinger) or is published by a non-Catholic press, the writer is virtually
invisible to the congregation. He or she doesnt count in the pursuit of
the Oscar for worst performance. Even though laypeople do most of the pastoral
ministry in the church today, they constitute a lesser caste. Has the age of
the laity really arrived? Since some of the best younger Catholic theologians
are now laypeople, it will be interesting to see if their research gets Vatican
attention.
One cant but wonder if there isnt a touch of sadism
involved in investigating only those who can be put on the rack. Sadism is
broadly defined as delight in cruelty. I acknowledge the good
intentions of the inquisitors who see their job as the preservation of true
doctrine. But as thought police they are in the business of inflicting
punishment on those who stray from conventional ways of presenting theology.
They impose considerable suffering on their targets: loss of jobs or
reputations with the heavy psychological trauma for some of being seen as
erroneous outcasts after many years of serving the church. Do the inquisitors
lose heart for the game if they cant lay a glove on the perpetrator of
the error? Is it just no fun for them to go after the heretics who cant
be assailed with severe sanctions?
Take the case of Sr. Jeannine Gramick. By just about any standard,
she is far less heretical than Ruether. But Gramick, as a nun, can
be gotten to. No amount of huffing and puffing on the part of the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith will bring down the walls of Ruethers
Garrett School of Theology and Northwestern University. The archaic mode of the
congregations disapproval would enhance her book sales.
The accepted way of critiquing theology today is by open peer
review. Is punishment, or the threat thereof, a prerequisite to energize the
complete inquisitor? Is there some unconscious sadism in this? Perhaps the
Ratzinger team can add some of this soul-searching to their Lenten renewal.
Eugene Bianchi, professor of religion at Emory University, is
on the board of the Association for the Rights of Catholics in the Church. His
e-mail address is releb@emory.edu
National Catholic Reporter, April 20,
2001
|