Saying no to the Vatican:
Obedience is a complex matter
By MARGOT PATTERSON
NCR Staff
Its not an everyday occurrence when a nun gets a directive
from the Vatican, and its certainly not an everyday occurrence when she
declines to follow it.
Recently, Benedictine Sr. Christine Vladimiroff, prioress of Mount
St. Benedict Monastery in Erie, Pa., did just that, however, with a letter sent
to her by the Congregation for Institutes for the Consecrated Life and the
Societies of Apostolic Life. The letter asked Vladimoff to persuade Sr. Joan
Chittister, a member of her community and a well-known author and speaker, to
forego attending an international conference on the ordination of women where
Chittister was scheduled to speak (NCR, July 13).
Failing persuasion, Vladimiroff was to hand Chittister the
congregations prohibition of her going. But after lengthy discussions
with Chittister about her attendance at the June 29-July 1 conference in
Dublin, Ireland, as well as a trip to Rome to meet with the congregation and
conversations with the entire Erie community, Vladimiroff chose not to deliver
Romes prohibition to Chittister. In making her decision, Vladimiroff said
she was guided by her feeling that to do so would violate both
Chittisters conscience and her own.
The face-off between Vladimiroff and the Vatican, which has
attracted attention in both the religious and secular press, has sparked
discussion about the nature and understanding of obedience in religious life
today as well as a closer look at a community of nuns that has established
itself as a bold, independent voice within the American church.
Vladimiroffs action was widely supported by her community, with all but
one member of the 128-member community in Erie signing the letter Vladimiroff
sent to Rome.
Pope John Paul II has said the church has no authority to ordain
women as priests. Since November 1995, the Vatican has banned discussion of
womens ordination. The issue remains alive, however -- witness the
conference in Dublin -- and Chittister is one of the leading voices calling for
open discussion of it. After the conference, the Vatican said Chittister as
well as conference organizer Notre Dame de Namur Sr. Myra Poole would not be
penalized for their participation in it.
Still unclear is whether Vladimiroff might be subject to
disciplinary action for her refusal to deliver Romes missive to
Chittister. The press office of the Holy See has not responded to inquiries.
James Coriden, a canon lawyer at the Washington Theological Union, said any
penalties would be at Romes discretion and would depend on the content of
the letter given Vladimiroff. I dont know if what she considered
discretionary judgment, they would consider disobedience, he said.
Fr. Tom Green, a canon lawyer at The Catholic University of
America, said Vladimiroffs decision might be seen as failure to obey a
legitimate precept and subject to a just penalty, which is the
mildest form of punishment. A just penalty is an unspecified penalty and can be
described more in the negative than in the positive. It would exclude
excommunication or removal from office, Green said.
Vladimiroff called the decision she reached extremely
difficult and rooted in the Benedictine, or monastic, tradition of
obedience. In a recent letter sent to Rome, Vladimiroff said that her action in
no way reflected a lack of communion with the church.
I simply explained to the congregation that I had spent many
hours discussing with Joan her participation in the Dublin conference and I
tried to point out to her the concerns that the Congregation for Religious had
about her participation. I established the fact that she was a mature person
who had lived a monastic life of faith and fidelity for 50 years, and her
decision had to come out of her sense of church and her monastic identity and
her own personal integrity. My role as prioress is really to be a spiritual
guide to her and to help her with the journey of seeking God, Vladimiroff
told NCR.
If Vladimiroffs non-compliance with the Vatican directive
has made her a hero to some and a rebel to others, most Benedictines would
agree that obedience is not a simple or automatic action.
The rule of Benedict talks about how we have departed from
God by disobedience and so we return to God by obedience. The Latin word for
obedience means listening. The whole concept of the rule of
obedience centers around listening with the ear of the heart, said Sr.
Esther Fangman, president of the Federation of St. Scholastica, a federation of
22 Benedictine communities in North America.
A Benedictine type of obedience differs from a top-down kind
of model, Fangman said. Its not militaristic. Its not
like a boss and subject. The prioress is a center of unity, not a point of
power in the community. Shes a spiritual leader. The point is to draw the
community to openness to hearing Gods will.
Benedictine life involves a constant process of discernment,
Fangman said, with each individual decision taking place within this context.
Vladimiroffs stand contrasts with how the School Sisters of
Notre Dame chose to handle a similar directive silencing Sr. Jeannine Gramick.
In that case, the superior of the order delivered Gramick a letter from the
Vatican in 1999 and a year later issued her own formal precept of obedience.
The first directive from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith ordered
Gramick to discontinue her ministry with gays and lesbians; the second
directive ordered Gramick to refrain from speaking about the ministry
shed pursued for 20 years.
Of course, I would love it if the SSND had responded the way
the Benedictines did, but there are reasons that explain why they did
not, Gramick said of the difference in how the two communities handled
the orders from the Vatican.
A congregation with 128 members like the Erie community is more
able to debate issues and develop solidarity than a congregation of more than
5,000 members such as the School Sisters of Notre Dame, Gramick said. Her own
case preceded the Vaticans effort to silence Chittister by more than a
year and prompted a number of U.S. congregations to sponsor forums on silencing
and consider what they would do in similar circumstances. In addition to such
factors as size and timing, Gramick said the two religious congregations draw
on different perceptions of authority.
An attitude of following authority is more ingrained in the
religious experience of an international congregation with roots in Europe
[such as the School Sisters of Notre Dame] than in a U.S. congregation [such as
the Benedictines] where notions of pluralism, questioning, and individual
rights are endemic to the religious as well as secular culture, Gramick
said.
In both instances, Gramick called the religious superiors
involved, Sr. Rosemary Howarth and Vladimiroff, good and holy women who
were faithful to their own integrity. Each decision was the result of much
reflection, consultation and prayer. Each woman was obedient to the will of God
as she understood it.
Unlike many religious orders, Benedictines do not have a superior
general in Rome. Each Benedictine community is autonomous with its own elected
head. According to Benedictine Fr. Joel Rippinger, formation director at
Marmion Abbey in Illinois and the author of History of the Benedictine Order
in the United States, Benedictines come from a tradition of independence
and autonomy and have historically seen themselves as operating within the
church but on the margins. Indeed, in a public statement Vladimiroff later
released she spoke of her desire to be faithful to the early Desert
Fathers and Mothers of the 4th century who lived on the margins of society in
order to be a prayerful and questioning presence to both church and
society.
To try to speak of a unifocal Benedictine tradition either
in the past or today is very difficult because the very nature is one of
diversity, said Rippinger. While the Erie community can legitimately
claim to be standing in the Benedictine tradition, Rippinger said
Vladimiroffs decision in this instance to reject the Vaticans
demand would probably not elicit widespread support among Benedictines.
What you can find is that there will be any number of other
Benedictine communities who think theyre coming from the same tradition
and who would really see a deeper tradition to adhere to any directives coming
from the church authorities. You can certainly find historical precedents of
historically significant persons such as Hildegard of Bingen or medieval
religious women superiors who did take a strong and independent stand at
variance with members of the ordinance or local hierarchy. I would think if you
would really do a dispassionate examination of the entire tradition that this
autonomy usually does not conflict with directives from church
authorities, said Rippinger. When it does, you come up against what
you re seeing now.
Rippinger views the independent, assertive character of the Erie
Benedictine community within an American context in which Benedictine women
have had to fight for their autonomy from church authorities.
When the Benedictine sisters came to the United States in
the 19th century, they were given a status that did not recognize them as full
nuns. They were not able to take solemn vows. They did not take papal cloister.
Bishops had full control over most of these communities. They were really seen
as active apostolic orders of women rather than as a monastic community,
Rippinger said.
Serving an immigrant church even more starved for priests than it
is today, Benedictine monks in 19th-century America commonly became priests and
as such possessed greater clout than Benedictine sisters. From the beginning,
Benedictine abbots were able to maintain an independence that Benedictine nuns
had to struggle to acquire and which today they see as vital to their spiritual
health, said Rippinger, who sees the negative historical experience of
Benedictine women in this country as well as the influence of feminism as the
background to Eries answer to the Vatican.
Rippinger said the community at Erie has emerged as a unique voice
on the American scene. It speaks to a new collaborative, consensual paradigm
within the church that reserves wide latitude to the individual conscience and
which would not be characteristic of Benedictine communities around the world,
he said.
Chittister talk on Web 07/27/2001 The full text of Benedictine Sr.
Joan Chittister's talk at the Women's Ordination Worldwide conference in
Dublin, Ireland, June 30 can be found on the documents page of NCR Online:
http://www.natcath.com/NCR_Online/documents/index.htm
National Catholic Reporter, July 27,
2001
|