Viewpoint Pax Christis inclusivity worth defending
By TOM CORDARO
As one who was closely involved with
the decision regarding the cancellation of the Pax Christi USA national
assembly when the university where we were scheduled to meet objected to our
keynote speaker, I feel it is important to clarify some of the issues that have
surfaced in the news and letters pages of NCR.
The first thing to make clear is that this conflict is not about
the churchs teaching on abortion. Pax Christi has always embraced the
churchs teaching on the violence and immorality of abortion and has made
its views public. What is at issue is the way this teaching is lived out in our
political and social context.
Pax Christi USA is a membership organization. Our registered
members, through their elected representatives, set the direction for our work.
I believe the majority of our members have strategically determined that the
best way for Pax Christi USA to address the issue of abortion is to focus on
many of the hardships faced by women who find it difficult to bring children
into this world, that is, the second-class status of women in society,
reinforced by the church, which limits the ability of women to come through for
their children; the violence and sexual exploitation of women that makes it
difficult for many to claim control over their own bodies; the lack of
affordable family housing, a family wage for workers, quality child care,
family health care, and the misappropriation of resources for weapons of war
that leaves so many women and their children struggling for survival.
The U.S. Catholic church has allocated an enormous amount of
resources primarily toward political strategies to criminalize abortion. Given
this context, I believe the majority of our members see no need for Pax Christi
USA to become involved in the effort to criminalize abortion when the
institutional church has already provided so many ways for them to join in this
effort. Our members want Pax Christi USA to take a different approach.
Pax Christi USA embraces the seamless garment ethic that was
championed by the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago. I believe that
within Pax Christi there is a consensus on this approach. What is at issue for
a minority of our members is how the seamless garment is to be used --
especially as it relates to making moral assessments of individuals and
organizations.
There are some Pax Christi members who would use the seamless
garment ethic in an exclusive manner. These folks take the view that because
the seamless garment holds to a consistent life ethic on all life issues, any
individual and/or organization we might hold up, honor or work in close
association with, should have the correct views on every life issue. One
problem with this approach is that no one completely conforms to this measure.
For instance, any U.S. citizen who pays taxes or purchases consumer products
made overseas participates in systems that kill. Another problem comes with
trying to identify which life issues to include in such a litmus test.
The second approach, which I believe represents the majority of
Pax Christi members, uses the seamless garment ethic in an inclusive manner.
Assessments by these folks are based on looking at all the views and actions of
the person or group across the entire life spectrum and making judgments based
on the whole person or group and not on a check list in which one wrong answer
calls for immediate disqualification. One shortcoming with this approach is
that it can lead down a slippery slope where assessments become
rationalizations. For instance, how many wrong answers does it take
to make a negative overall assessment?
Given the pros and cons of both approaches I believe that the Pax
Christi national leadership did the right thing by embracing an inclusive
approach regarding the speaking invitation extended to the Rev. James Lawson,
civil rights activist and retired United Methodist minister. I say this for
four reasons.
The first reason is that our members would have been blessed by
hearing Lawson speak to us about his lifetime commitment to nonviolence, peace
and racial justice. Given his historical connection to Memphis and the depth of
his spiritual journey, he was, in my opinion, just what our movement needed at
this crucial point in our history.
The second reason is that historically, the seamless garment
approach came out of a struggle within the church over the place of abortion in
Catholic social teaching. The seamless garment position expressed the desire of
many in the church to place the abortion issue within a larger context that
would enable Catholics to make political judgments about candidates that would
be larger than the single issue of abortion. The seamless garment approach was
a challenge to single issue pro-lifers as well as a challenge to liberals who
paid no attention to the abortion issue. In the context of Bernardins
later work on the Common Ground Initiative, I think we can see his desire in
the seamless garment approach to find an inclusive way of acting in the
political arena. Let me quote here from the mission statement from the Seamless
Garment Network:
We are committed to the protection of life, which is threatened
in todays world by war, the arms race, abortion, poverty, racism, capital
punishment and euthanasia. We believe that these issues are linked under a
consistent ethic of life. We challenge those working on all or some
of these issues to maintain a cooperative spirit of peace, reconciliation, and
respect in protecting the unprotected.
The third reason for advocating this approach is that, given the
current climate of intolerance within the U.S. Catholic church on so many
issues, I think it is important for Pax Christi USA to be a countersign. There
are so many Catholics who feel marginalized by what they see as the
heavy-handed approach of the institutional church when dealing with those
calling for dialogue on many important issues. In almost every issue of
NCR we see instances where good, faithful men and women are banned from
Catholic institutions, dis-invited from conferences, silenced from public
speaking and threatened with dismissal or fired from working within the
institutional church. Organizations like Pax Christi USA represent, for many, a
safe haven within the Roman Catholic community. For Pax Christi USA to fall
into a position of intolerance would be a crushing blow to all those who still
wait in the dark for the sun to shine again.
The fourth reason for favoring the inclusive approach to the
seamless garment position is the recognition of our social and political
context in the United States. The cause of peace with justice is not served by
narrowing our constituency or making negative moral assessments of those
individuals or groups we may disagree with on any given life issue. To be sure
there are pitfalls in this approach. Mistakes may be made and correct judgments
are often hard to come by. But, as followers of the nonviolent Jesus, who held
up as examples and honor occupying Roman soldiers, heretical Samaritans and
sinners of all sorts, I think we can do no less.
Tom Cordaro is Pax Christi USA national council
chairperson.
National Catholic Reporter, September 7,
2001
|