Special
Report Expert tracks radical Islamic movements
By MARGOT PATTERSON
Reading Judith Millers 1996 book, God Has Ninety-Nine
Names: Reporting from a Militant Middle East, has its occasional chilling
moments. One occurs during a 1993 interview Miller had with Libyas Col.
Muammar Qaddafi, who surprised her by arguing that the United States should
make common cause with Libya in working to destroy Islamic terrorists.
An occasional sponsor of terrorism himself, Qaddafi told Miller
that the Gulf War bred a new hatred for the United States among Islamic
militants that may rebound against the United States. You funded Islamic
militants in Afghanistan and all over the world and then were surprised when
they turned on you. You brought it upon yourselves, Qaddafi said.
Now that the world knows Osama bin Laden was once on the CIA
payroll and that he is said to be behind the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Qaddafis remarks appear all too apt
for anyones comfort. Its one of many incidents in Millers
book that take on greater resonance given the terrorist attacks on the United
States in September. So, too, does her account of a young Osama bin Laden
showing up in the offices of various Saudi princes before the Gulf War armed
with flowcharts and maps, eager to persuade them that foreign troops were not
necessary for the defense of Saudi Arabia.
More relevant still may be her description of the immense
demographic pressures in the developing countries of the Mideast, where
millions of young men, often college-educated, have no jobs or hopes of
attaining one and who turn to radical Islamic movements out of despair with the
bleak prospects they face.
Throughout the Middle East, Miller writes, these Islamic movements
are reshaping the national agenda, even when governments clamp down on them
with repression (Egypt, for example) or co-optation (Jordan or Saudi Arabia)
or, as often happens, both.
Miller, 50, has spent much of her career covering the Mideast. She
was Cairo, Egypt, bureau chief for The New York Times from 1983 to 1986
and later the newspapers special correspondent in the Gulf War. In the
aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States, she has
become a frequent guest on TV news programs such as The Today Show
and Face the Nation, where shes become the on-air expert on
Islamic militancy as well as on the elusive bin Laden. The latter is a
personality who she says should not be underestimated nor should those who work
with him. These are highly motivated, often well-educated people, not people
who can be dismissed as crazy fanatics, she has said, or at least not crazy,
though fanatics they may be.
In her book on Islamic militancy in the Middle East, Miller makes
clear that Islamic movements come in many shapes and forms in the different
countries of the Middle East and that the reasons for Islamic revivalism vary
from country to country. Nonetheless, she clearly sees Islamic militancy as
posing both a threat internally to the national stability of secular
governments and to the West. Descriptions of militant Islamic networks
operating in the United States will give pause to many readers in the wake of
the Sept. 11 attacks.
Millers view of the Islamic threat has been criticized in
some quarters. Reviewing God has Ninety-Nine Names for The
Nation, Edward Said, a professor of literature at Columbia University and
the author of several books on Palestinians and the Middle East, called it a
one-sided, partisan account that perpetuates Western stereotypes. That
criticism aside, however, Millers account of how different countries in
the Middle East have contended with -- and often contributed to -- Islamic
militancy will have immediacy for many Americans wanting to understand more
about the causes of the war on terrorism.
A series of articles she wrote for the Times about
Afghanistan in January of this year examined what may be Afghanistans
only viable export: international terrorism. A dozen camps in Afghanistan
maintained by bin Laden train recruits in small arms and in explosives and
logistics for terrorist attacks, she wrote in January. More disturbing still,
she reported that American and Mideast intelligence officials believe one camp
in Afghanistan is training recruits in the uses of chemicals, poisons and
toxins. Her most recent book, Germs: Biological Weapons and Americas
Secret War, co-written with Stephen Engelberg and William Broad, examines
the development of biological weapons in laboratories in the Mideast, the
Soviet Union and this country and sounds the alarm that biological terrorism is
right around the corner.
Most countries in that region [the Mideast] are working on
biological and chemical weapons, Miller said in a recent telephone
interview. The frightening prospect of biological terrorism is one reason she
thinks the United States current effort to eradicate Osama bin
Ladens network is so important. But Germs: Biological Weapons and
Americas Secret War also reports on a massive program by the Soviet
Union to develop biological weapons as well as the CIAs own effort to
secretly build and test a Soviet-designed germ bomb. And Miller and her
co-authors recount that in the 1960s the U.S. military possessed plans to use
germ warfare in Cuba.
Germs was an outgrowth of her reporting on the Mideast, especially
the Gulf War, Miller told NCR. The Iraqis made thousands and
thousands of liters of anthrax and other biological agents, and they
didnt admit it until 1995, said Miller, who believes that the
Iraqis were so loath to admit they possessed biological weapons because these
were the weapons the Iraqis prized most. Once I found out that Iraq was
so intent on getting [these weapons], thats when I began to wonder if
Osama Bin Laden was interested in getting them. The fact of the matter is, that
if he can get his hands on weapons of mass destruction, he will try to use
them, Miller said.
According to Miller, the Gulf War played a critical role in
mobilizing militant Islamists against the United States. Bin Laden, for one, is
reported to have been angry that U.S. troops were stationed on sacred soil in
Saudi Arabia, though Miller observed that in fact U.S. troops were nowhere near
the sacred cities of Mecca and Medina. Still, the fact that troops stayed past
the end of the war angered Osama bin Laden, as did American support for what he
saw as corrupt Arab regimes.
The fodder and the fervor for what was Osama bin
Ladens then-very-young movement came from the Gulf War, said
Miller. The roots of that movement, the organization bin Laden founded,
preceded the Gulf War, however. Bin Ladens Al Qaeda (Arabic for The Base)
organization was founded in the late 1980s.
It was founded as the Soviets were being defeated,
Miller said. It was the defeat of the Soviet Union that led Osama to the
conclusion that the jihad could be expanded beyond the borders of the Soviet
Union. The proof was that this great military superpower couldnt hack it,
in the same way we couldnt hack it in Vietnam. This made his argument and
his philosophy more compelling. There was no doubt that it helped him [with
recruiting], she said.
Today, Miller and other colleagues at The New York Times
report that Osama Bin Laden may have terrorist cells in as many as 50 countries
ranging from Saudi Arabia and Egypt to Tunis and the Philippines, all working
for the jihad, or holy war, declared by bin Laden.
These jihad groups have their own priorities, and they tend
to cooperate. Its one of the many reasons this movement is so hard to
track. You never know whos going to turn up where, Miller said.
For this and many reasons, Miller believes the war against
terrorism will be neither simple nor easy nor does she think getting rid of
Osama bin Laden alone will end terrorism. The terrorist network has deep roots,
she has said, and the people who work in it are both determined and
resourceful.
Unfortunately, anti-American feeling in the Mideast not only has a
long history but is growing, she said, fueled by intellectuals in the region as
well as by state-controlled newspapers, which should make the United States
question the friendship of some of its allies. The Clinton
administrations inability to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
exacerbated hostility toward the United States. Resentment is further
aggravated by the Bush administrations unwillingness now to involve
itself in the issue, which she said is perceived by Arabs as indifference to
their plight and contempt. But anti-American feeling extends far beyond the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, she said.
Whether or not that conflict is solved, these militant
Islamic movements will continue because even though they pay lip service to the
Palestinian cause, most of them dont care much about the
Palestinians, Miller said.
Margot Patterson is NCRs senior writer. Her e-mail
address is mpatterson@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, October 5,
2001
|