Cover
story Pressures that led to an empire-wide movement
The Nine Crusades, which took place in the 11th, 12th and 13th
centuries, were a counteroffensive by Christians against Muslims occupying the
Holy Land.
Was the Islamic threat real? You betcha, said
Professor Paul E. Chevedden. Islamic conquest had taken from Christendom
its choicest provinces -- Syria, Egypt, North Africa and Iberia [Spain and
Portugal].
Islam pushed its way north into Italy until it captured Monte
Cassino, St. Benedicts monastery, then moved into eastern Switzerland. On
the Great St. Bernard Pass, Muslims even captured the abbot of Cluny,
France.
The Crusades, in response, were applications of Roman
Catholicisms just war tradition, said Chevedden of
UCLAs Gustav E. von Grunebaum Center for Near Eastern Studies. Islam had
the Holy Land, and the pope wanted it back.
A grave pitfall for today, insists Chevedden, would be to view the
Crusades in isolation from the world-transforming events in the Mediterranean
and in western Asia at the turn of the second millennium. Those events included
pressures from expanding populations, rapidly developing urbanism, intellectual
and technological inquiries and advances, plus rising commerce pushing into new
areas.
The clash between Christendom and Islam was a 1,000-year struggle,
the most protracted conflict in human history. What should not be overlooked,
Chevedden said, is that, for the most part, Islam, rather than Christianity,
was in the ascendancy.
Scott Bartchy, director of UCLAs Center for the Study of
Religion, though well aware of what Islam gave to the West during those 1,000
years, looks at the early heritage of both Christianity and Islam from the
perspective of violence/nonviolence.
During the first 250 to 300 years of Christianity, it was
initially persecuted, then scapegoated through four more tense periods, as it
became an empire-wide movement. Never, emphasized Bartchy,
never once during this period is anybody killed in the name of Jesus. The
Christians are not a guerrilla band, they are not social bandits. They stay in
the urban environment, gain a reputation not only for helping their own widows
and orphans, but others as well. Not only burying their own dead but -- a
major deal at that time -- other peoples as well. They never become
violent.
Bartchy called it remarkable that Jesus
nonviolence had taken such a hold across those early centuries. It
was Emperor Constantines adopting Christianity as the Roman Empires
religion in the fourth century that wrecked things. He never got
it, said Bartchy. He puts the Chi-Rho symbol on Roman shields, and
for the first time Christians start killing people in the name of
Jesus.
Bartchy contrasts that Jesus with Islams Muhammad who, in
the early seventh century, goes into Medina and in effect becomes the
civil authority. Functionally hes an innovator, a Jesus of Nazareth and a
Constantine, all rolled into one. Bartchy said Muhammad never ever
renounces violence, and for all the fine things in the Islamic tradition,
theres never been any serious commitment to nonviolence. In a war, if you
follow the prophet, you shouldnt hurt women or children. Or trees. Quite
charming that. And the violence should be defensive.
Bartchy said that after the Crusades the Near Eastern Islamic
world felt itself transgressed upon, and theres a certain victim
mentality. Culturally, he said, Muslims saved much from the Greek
philosophers that the West later appropriated. Technologically Islam held its
own, even into the 16th and 17th centuries. But then the West got the
technological edge in military stuff and began pushing, said Bartchy,
and the Muslims again get into the mentality of being victims.
Consequently, Bartchy summarized, today some of the more
extreme people have given themselves permission to do almost anything in the
name of defense. And thats what we see.
The Crusades were religious, political and economic. The First
Millennium had just ended, the 11th century was the setting of an enormous
spiritual revival. For centuries, with the Holy Land under benign Islamic rule,
pilgrims traveled together to Jerusalem under arms to protect themselves from
robbers. Confessors in that era regularly gave pilgrimages as a penance, so
ensuring the safety of pilgrims was one element of the Crusades.
Other elements included merchants in Italian cities wanting
Eastern trading outlets and the ambitions of chivalrous knights -- high-born
youths looking for action and conquest.
There also was a shift within Islam precipitating the Crusades.
The more restrictive Turkish Muslims had taken over the Holy Land, and the
pope, disenchanted with the warring European nobles inability to form a
coalition to battle Islam, brought his own unifying authority to bear.
The scene was set, and all the elements combined in the urge to
free the Holy Land from Islam. Thus the Nine Crusades, each generally less
successful than the one before it.
-- Arthur Jones
National Catholic Reporter, October 26,
2001
|