|
Viewpoint We need new way of teaching history
By MARY BADER
To a generation that came of age
with John Kennedys challenge to ask not what your country can do
for you; ask what you can do for your country, the suggestion that we go
shopping fell a little flat. Then we were told we should volunteer in our
communities to strengthen the nation in its war on terrorism. Better. But not
good enough.
Then there was the childrens program, a sort of war on
terrorism Sunday school in which the children of America were asked to get on
board by sending in their dollars to help buy food and medicine for Afghan
children. Strangely, with this idea George Bush actually is pointing in a
direction where average Americans really can make a difference. This is so even
though the childrens dollar-collection campaign is, at best, a
transparently inadequate public-relations response to the misery of the
Afghans, now made more miserable by American bombs and the prospect of
starvation. Nevertheless, Bushs idea of involving the children is a
symbolic step in the right direction. That direction is, at once, the future
and the past.
If our children are to have a future, they must know the past, but
our generation has been almost a total failure in the legacy department. And if
our children are to have a future, they must prepare to share it with children
from many other cultures, but our generation has done little to prepare them
for the world they will inherit. Our lack of knowledge about the world outside
America -- and Americas role in it -- has caught up with us. Our
inclination to combine the teaching of history with the coaching of high school
football has made us an ignorant people with the best football teams in the
world. And it has made us a people whose news magazines must explain to us, as
Newsweek did recently, Why they hate us.
This is not the first time we have been caught off-guard. When the
Russians launched their Sputnik in 1957, threatening American dominance in
science and technology, American leaders began demanding that our schools
emphasize science and math. That emphasis yielded some spectacular
achievements. It also yielded a distortion that equates classroom computers
with educational excellence. Whatever else we might say about our
generations emphasis on technology, its limits were painfully apparent
Sept. 11.
Now America faces a crisis of infinitely more consequence than we
faced with Sputnik, and this time math and science are not the answers. This
time, what we need is an ambitious, nationwide dedication to the study of
history -- our own history and the histories of the other people with whom our
children will share the planet when we are gone. And by the study of history, I
do not mean the mind-numbing memorization of generals names and battle
dates, or the lifeless social studies model. What we need is a new
way of communicating history as the story of humanity, a new way of teaching
how our past has led to our present, and of how our present is creating our
future. What is needed is deep exploration of the ideas and events that shape
our world, whether we pay attention to them or not. And this deep exploration
must be part of everyones basic education, not just that of a small
elite. We should give history the sort of emphasis we have given math and
science for the past four decades.
In our grief and righteous anger since Sept. 11, an irony has gone
largely unnoticed. The overwhelming majority of Americans descend from
immigrants who came here from all over the world, yet we know so little about
it. What can we do for our country? The answer, too, is ironic. We can learn
about other countries. And we can teach our children. Yes, encourage them to
send their dollars to buy food and medicine for the little Afghan children. And
then, turn off the cartoons for a while and start their education.
Let the next generation of Americans know the world and its people
better than we do. Let them know our Constitution and how its meaning has
evolved. Let them know also why other people live under other values, what
those values are, and how they challenge our own. Let them learn to pledge
allegiance to the flag and to be patriotic, but let them also learn to be
respectful of other people who pledge to different flags. Then, perhaps, when
their generation is running America, there will be less need for a news
magazine to explain why they hate us.
Mary Bader, a former NCR columnist, is a writer in
Minneapolis.
National Catholic Reporter, December 14,
2001
|
|