Sanctuary leaders renew defense of asylum
seekers
By JAMES REEL
Tucson, Ariz.
On March 24, 1982, a group of religious leaders and social
activists in Tucson, Ariz., declared the Rev. John Fifes Southside
Presbyterian Church the first public sanctuary for Central American refugees in
the United States. Soon, at least 330 churches across the country joined the
Sanctuary movement, providing safe havens for Central Americans fleeing death
squads and oppression.
The movement also pressed for reform of U.S. government policy
that supported right-wing Central American governments and that blocked
refugees efforts to enter this country legally to seek formal asylum.
Some Sanctuary workers helped refugees cross the border illegally and
transported them through the country in defiance of U.S. law.
Twenty years and two felony convictions later, John Fife is
spoiling for another fight.
According to Fife, political refugees, particularly from Colombia,
are still being turned away at American ports of entry by ignorant,
unprepared immigration officials following the immoral and illegal policies of
the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Furthermore, said Fife, the Border Patrols effort to seal
the line at major border towns hasnt reduced illegal immigration of
either refugees or economic migrants. That strategy has deliberately
shifted the crossing points to the most dangerous areas of the desert, he
said.
As a result, dozens of illegal border crossers succumb to
115-degree temperatures each summer. In Southern Arizona alone, the death toll
last fiscal year was 102; of those deaths, 78 occurred in the Border
Patrols 271-mile-wide Tucson Sector. Since October, 12 people have died
in the Tucson Sector. Thats an improvement since this time last year,
when the figure held briefly at 23. Crossings came to a near halt immediately
after Sept. 11, and have now resumed.
The most recent Arizona fatality was Arturo Heras Espinoza, 34, a
Mexican economic migrant who died from dehydration March 22 -- the first day of
a weekend-long Sanctuary celebration in Tucson. There, Fife and others called
for the borderland faith community to renew its active commitment to
refugees.
There may be a need for another civil initiative to protect
these people again, he said.
By legal standards, the Sanctuary movement failed. In 1985, 11
Sanctuary workers -- including Fife, two Catholic priests and three nuns --
were indicted on federal charges of smuggling aliens. After a six-month trial,
eight of the defendants were convicted on various felony and misdemeanor
counts. None went to prison; most were sentenced to probation, with one
receiving a suspended sentence.
Yet during the highly publicized trial, the number of Sanctuary
churches more than doubled. By 1990, the movement was credited for the
governments decision to stop deporting and begin issuing work permits to
Guatemalans and Salvadorans whose asylum applications were under review.
In 1992, following the signing of peace accords in Central
America, Fife threw a party at his church and formally declared the Sanctuary
movement to be over. But last weekends reunion became a revival of sorts,
as Sanctuary veterans and new recruits agreed on the need for a fresh,
faith-based commitment to refugee work.
Guenet Guebre-Christos, representing the U.S. and Caribbean
interests of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, told the group
that war and political persecution no longer exclusively determine refugee
patterns. She said economic, social, cultural and gender-based discrimination
are increasing causes of displacement.
Guebre-Christos criticized the United States restrictive
immigration law of 1996, which allowed INS workers untrained in the asylum
process to turn away potentially legitimate asylum seekers at the border. She
also decried the strengthened border control measures that cause more asylum
seekers to turn to smugglers who take them over dangerous terrain, too often
transforming their quest for a safe haven into a death march.
Guebre-Christos urged religious organizations to spread the
word of welcome to asylum seekers in religious services and educational
programs.
She and other participants, including Tucson immigration attorney
Lynn Marcus and U.N. attorney Elizabeth Dallam, urged support of two refugee
bills making their way through Congress. One, the Refugee Protection Act
(HR4074), introduced in the House March 20, would promote alternatives to
detention and would loosen rules on asylum applications.
The other, the Senates Unaccompanied Child Protection Act
(S121), would appoint lawyers and guardians to represent the interests of lone
children detained at the border, and would reassign their oversight from the
INS to a new Office of Childrens Services in the Justice Department.
Children in administrative detention were a special concern at the
gathering. According to attorney Lee Tucker, each year 5,000 children are kept
in INS detention for more than 72 hours. About 30 percent of them are held in
juvenile jails, where they receive treatment equal to that of juvenile
delinquents. Assigned to bare cells, mingling with criminal kids, they are
taken to their court appearances (where 80 percent lack legal representation)
in prison uniforms and restraints, handcuffed for as long as eight hours.
Thats a humiliating, degrading experience for these kids,
Tucker said.
Meanwhile, several small-scale advocacy programs have arisen. One
is the Asylum Program of Southern Arizona, which currently provides legal aid
for 54 non-detained, indigent refugees seeking asylum. Another is the
faith-based community organization Humane Borders, which presses for more
liberal immigration policies and work programs and a demilitarized border. The
group maintains water stations in remote parts of the desert where illegal
crossers often die of dehydration.
That last activity rankles observers who feel that creating oases
in the desert will only encourage people to make the illegal trek. Advocates,
including Fr. Ricardo Elford of Tucson, insisted that it is necessary to face
the reality of illegal crossings and establish humane procedures to reduce the
death and suffering.
Fife has told the Border Patrol that if hes on a water run
and finds illegals in distress, he will defy the law and drive them to medical
help rather than turn them in -- just like in the early Sanctuary days.
A. Bates Butler, one of the Sanctuary defense attorneys, pointed
out that in the current anti-terrorism, anti-immigrant climate, people like
Fife engaging in civil initiatives are more likely to go to jail
than they were 20 years ago. But Rabbi Joe Weizenbaum, an early Sanctuary
leader, said people committed to human rights work must put aside fear of
punishment.
Recalling his preparation for driving undocumented refugees up
from the border, he said, You just take a deep breath and say, This
is right.
Freelance writer James Reel lives in Tucson, Ariz.
National Catholic Reporter, April 5,
2002
|