Templeton Prize winner defends
Christianitys credibility in a scientific age
By RICH HEFFERN
The Templeton Foundation announced March 14 in New York City that
the 2002 Templeton Prize would go to the Rev. John C. Polkinghorne, a British
mathematical physicist and Anglican priest, and a key spokesperson for belief
in God in an age of science, defending that faith not against science but in
concert with it.
The Templeton Prize is the worlds largest annual monetary
prize given to an individual. Its founder, John M. Templeton, set the amount of
the prize so that it always exceeds the Nobel, believing that advances in the
spiritual realm are more important than those in the sciences. It currently
stands at 700,000 pounds sterling, just over $1 million.
Formerly given for progress in religion, the prize was
redefined this year as an award for progress toward research or
discoveries about spiritual realities including research in love, creativity,
purpose, infinity, intelligence, thanksgiving and prayer.
Polkinghorne, 71, resigned his position as professor of
mathematical physics at Cambridge University in England in 1979 to pursue
theology studies. He became a priest in 1982. Since then, his popular writings
and lectures have consistently applied scientific habits to the tenets and
beliefs of Christianity. He has become a leading figure in the ongoing dialogue
between science and religion.
Knighted in 1997, he is the fourth consecutive scientist to win
the Templeton. The award will be presented to him in a private ceremony by
Prince Philip April 29 at Buckingham Palace.
Polkinghorne has written more than 20 books, helping other
scientists to grasp the spiritual element in science, while pointing believers
toward the shrewd honesty that is the scientific enterprise. Once in a debate,
he noted how scientists are wary of religion because they think it involves
accepting things on authority. You dont have to commit intellectual
suicide, he said, to be a religious believer.
Polkinghorne has said he will use the money to fund postdoctoral
students working in the field of science and religion.
Sir John Templeton, philanthropist and global investment pioneer,
believed that the Nobel Prize had overlooked one of humanitys most
important areas of exploration: religion. To remedy that, in 1972 he
established the Prize for Progress in Religion. Funded in perpetuity by
Templeton, the award each year honors a living individual who has shown
originality in advancing understanding of God and/or spirituality. The first
award was presented the following year to Mother Teresa, six years before she
won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Other Catholics who have won the award include Benedictine Fr.
Stanley Jaki of Seton Hall University, a specialist in the history and
philosophy of science, in 1987 and political philosopher Michael Novak in
1994.
Polkinghorne was nominated for the prize by Thomas F. Torrance, a
Presbyterian theologian retired from the University of Edinburgh and the
recipient of the 1978 prize for his own work relating science and theology.
Polkinghorne has not only destroyed the idea that the
worldviews of science and theology are opposed to one another, but he has
opened up the road ahead for a new stage in conceptual integration which cannot
but make for immense progress in religion all over the world, the
nominating statement said.
According to John Haught, director of the Center for the Study of
Science and Religion at Georgetown University, Washington, Polkinghornes
contribution to the science-religion dialogue lies in providing a context for
bringing intelligibility to very traditional Christian beliefs. He stays
close to classical theology, Haught told NCR. In his view
there is no need to alter Christian religious thought drastically as do the
process theologians in order to accommodate scientific inquiry. Polkinghorne
looks science directly in the face, without flinching.
On such issues as how the universe was created and developed,
resurrection and immortality, Polkinghorne offers a fresh and sturdy defense of
Christianitys credibility, according to Haught. Moreover, Polkinghorne
emphasizes that religious discourse can be framed without reference to or
reliance upon any special exceptional or so-called miraculous
revelation.
He writes that religious inquiry complements science. Put
the two together and we have an ampler view of the way the world is. Music, for
example, is more than just vibrations in the air.
His most widely read and praised book is Faith of a
Physicist, subtitled Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker,
published by Fortress Press. Polkinghorne maintains that he works from the
bottom up, that is from empirically given data from nature, human consciousness
or from events in the New Testament, to examine and validate Christian
doctrine.
Polkinghorne studied under Paul Dirac, a 20th-century pioneer in
the field of elementary particle physics. He then taught mathematical physics
at Cambridge for more than two decades before resigning his professorship to
study theology. He has used his experience as an elementary particle physicist
to make sense of the Christian religion.
He points out that hes completely convinced of the existence
of elemental particles like quarks and gluons, the most basic constituents of
matter that currently are known to us, without ever having seen them. He and
his colleagues are sure of their existence because that belief makes sense of
large areas of physical experience that otherwise would be difficult to
understand. It is the intelligibility that belief in quarks confers that
persuades us of their reality, he writes. It is much the same for
my belief in the unseen reality of God. That belief too makes sense of great
swathes of human experience, from considering the wonderful fine-tuning of the
universe to my encounter with the figure of Jesus Christ as I meet him in
scripture, the sacraments and the church.
When asked if his exacting scientific background makes him wary of
the uncertainties of theology, Polkinghorne responded in an interview:
Far from it. Theology is much more difficult. Physics, at least at the
undergraduate level, is a subject on which the dust has settled. In theology
the dust never settles.
Many puzzles remain, he said, and the scientist and the
theologian can make common cause in the search for understanding, pursued with
openness, scrupulosity and humility, conscious of the great ocean of truth
lying undiscovered before us.
Rich Heffern is NCR opinion editor. His e-mail address
is rheffern@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, April 12,
2002
|