Church in
Crisis Bishops struggle to fashion sex abuse policy
By MARGOT PATTERSON
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops will meet in
Dallas June 13-15 to craft a national policy on clerical sexual abuse, but to
many Americans even the toughest policy may seem too little too late, making
the Dallas conference perhaps the most formidable public relations challenge a
national meeting of Catholic bishops has ever faced in this country.
With their credibility eroded, and with new revelations of sexual
abuse by priests and cover-up by superiors appearing regularly in the media,
the bishops are under pressure to act boldly and decisively to repair public
trust in the churchs ministers. At the same time many bishops acknowledge
that there is no magic bullet that will lay the scandal to rest.
Bishop Wilton Gregory, president of the United States Conference
of Catholic Bishops, has called lay involvement crucial to rebuilding
confidence in the church; some observers predict that one of the most tangible
outcomes of the conference will be a national board composed of prominent lay
Catholics to set standards on how dioceses should handle allegations of sex
abuse.
In an interview with the Associated Press, Bishop Joseph Galante,
coadjutor of the Dallas diocese, said proposals for a new sex abuse policy will
include immediate notification of allegations of abuse to law enforcement and
the creation of a national databank of priests guilty of sex abuse in order to
study sexual abuse in dioceses and seminaries. Galante is a member of the
bishops ad hoc committee on sexual abuse. A draft of the new policy is
expected to be made public June 4. Archbishop Harry Flynn of the St. Paul and
Minneapolis archdiocese, chairman of the ad hoc committee, did not return calls
by NCR nor did other members of the committee who were contacted.
To help resolve the scandal, research sociologist William
DAntonio said the bishops must establish lay boards at the parish and
diocesan level that are not only consultative but decision-making.
What I think bishops have needed to do, and I dont see
any sign that this is happening, is that they have to decide that the laity
have a rightful place in the governance of the church in matters such as
these, said DAntonio, the co-author of American Catholics:
Gender, Generation, and Commitment.
Imesch solicits opinions
At least in some dioceses, heightened efforts to consult with the
laity are already taking place. In Joliet, Ill., Bishop Joseph Imesch said he
was soliciting the opinions of the Catholic faithful in his diocese in
preparation for the meeting in Dallas and had sent a letter to every parish
council in the diocese.
Every bishop is pretty determined that we will do something
to help people get through this terrible time, Imesch said. We know
were not going to go there and come back with some kind of mild
statement. We want this to be over as much as anyone else does.
But like several other bishops, Imesch dismissed the idea that the
Dallas conference would put an end to the sex abuse scandal. Were
not going to be able to put [the scandal] behind us. Were going to
address it. Its still going to be there and its not going to go
away. We have to just prove that were serious about our concern for the
safety of children.
Thomas Gumbleton, auxiliary bishop of Detroit, said both
individually and as a conference, Roman Catholic bishops in the United States
need to be more forthright about their failures during the past 15 to 20 years
and accept responsibility for them. My reading of the various statements
that have come out from individual bishops and Rome is its still too much
If something happened, were sorry.
Bishops who were overseeing all of this made tremendous
mistakes, mistakes that had profound, hurtful results for many, many
people, said Gumbleton. Many people have the sense that the bishops
have yet not taken full responsibility for what they did that was wrong.
Thats what makes many people angry. No bishop has really said, Yes,
I made these terrible mistakes, and if thats serious enough to resign,
Ill resign. Thats what needs to be done at some
point.
Bishop Matthew Clark of Rochester, N.Y., called for bishops to
deal with the scandal before them publicly, honestly, openly and
humbly.
With each bishop answerable only to the pope, Clark questioned
whether a national policy was possible, given the autonomy bishops possess.
The bishops could commit themselves to a policy unanimously. My best
understanding is if one bishop said no, I dont think hed be obliged
to go along, Clark said. I dont think that [a national
policy] is likely to happen for that reason. Thats not to say we
wont come out with a very strong statement.
Charles Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network
of those Abused by Priests, known as SNAP, said, Were not
tremendously optimistic. These are largely the same men who got us into this
mess to begin with.
The importance of experts
Clohessy said most bishops are well aware of the need for diocesan
review boards and most dioceses already have them, but they often suffer from
the same problems as diocesan policies on clerical sexual abuse. The
basic problem is often theyre ignored, bypassed. Theyre given
inadequate information and they hear from church leaders as opposed to
victims, Clohessy said.
Fr. Raymond OBrien, a professor of law at The Catholic
University of America, said the bishops meeting in Dallas is likely to
establish a lay board composed of prominent Catholics to set standards for
diocesan review panels. OBrien mentioned former FBI director Louis Freeh
and Harvard Law School professor Mary Ann Glendon as likely appointees and said
he hoped the bishops would also appoint clergy and non-Catholics to such a
board.
Despite public attention to the formulation of a zero tolerance
policy for priests guilty of sexual abuse, OBrien said the option of
enacting such a policy as a way of proving the churchs commitment to
protecting the safety of children will soon become moot as state legislatures
move to lift statutes of limitations on sexual abuse. OBrien said he
expects greater protection of due process for accused priests will result from
the meeting in Dallas and said bishops must confront the theological basis for
the scandal.
We need to go back to that and ask why was it the message we
preach is not being heard by the priests who are expected to preach it,
OBrien said. The churchs view of sexuality is that it should
be confined to marriage and, obviously, individuals over the age of 18 who are
in a state of consent. All of a sudden you have agents in that church who are
not only engaged in sex outside marriage but, secondly, with individuals less
than 18 years of age. How could this be?
An expert in family law who has written articles about AIDS,
pedophilia and the rights of children, OBrien said most of the reports of
clerical sexual abuse that have come to light recently are not cases of
pedophilia but the sexual abuse of minors. Most of the victims are male and
most are not children, he observed.
Sin and scandal
There are many professions who use their profession to gain
intimate contact with victims. That is not unique to priesthood,
OBrien said. Yet at the same time do we not hold ourselves out as
better than others? Yes. There is a confusion in the theology. I lay this at
the feet of the bishops.
What is serious enough to consider sin? Where
have we missed the point that this is a sin?
OBrien predicted greater scrutiny of Catholic finances and
charities in the future as a result of the scandal and said the privacy of the
confessional would soon become a legal issue that the bishops would have to
confront.
The whole culture has changed, said OBrien.
The idea of taking a young person alone anywhere -- those days are
gone.
While Catholics dont appear to be leaving the church because
of the scandal, OBrien said the toll on priests morale and the
future recruitment of priests is still an open question, as is the effect on
those who have been abused. Whats coming to light is
horrific, OBrien said.
Margot Patterson is NCR senior writer.
National Catholic Reporter, June 7,
2002
|