|World -- Analysis|
Issue Date: April 4, 2008
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rarely does an Easter Vigil become a news event, but this years Mass in St. Peters Basilica got the worlds attention. The reason: One of seven new Catholics personally baptized by Pope Benedict XVI was a high-profile Muslim, an Egyptian-born Italian journalist widely regarded as the successor to Oriana Fallaci in terms of visceral protest against Muslim extremism.
Magdi Allam, 55, formerly a self-described secular Muslim, had long expressed affinity for Catholicism. Hes a star attraction, for example, at the annual Communion and Liberation meeting in Rimini, Italy. In itself, Allams conversion thus came as no great surprise. The fact that Benedict baptized and confirmed Allam personally in such a high-profile setting, however, was taken in some quarters as a provocation.
Allam added fuel to the fire with an Easter Sunday letter to the editor of his own newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Among other things, Allam charged that deeper than the current wave of fundamentalist-inspired terrorism, Islam itself contains the root of evil because it is physiologically violent and historically prone to conflict.
All this was bound to produce blowback, and it wasnt long in coming.
Few questioned Allams right to convert, but Muslim leaders chafed at the public spotlight afforded by the pope. Aref ali Nayed, for example, director of the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre in Amman, Jordan, suggested that the affair provokes genuine questions about the motives, intentions and plans of some of the popes advisers on Islam. A piece on a Hamas-owned Web site by Palestinian journalist Khalid Amayreh objected to the purposefully high profile the Vatican gave this conversion, adding that the problem lies in the vindictive atmosphere, including anti-Islamic allusions and insinuations.
Critical notes were also heard from the Catholic world. Italian Catholic journalist Aldo Maria Valli published a letter that he said came from a priest working on the frontier with Islam, charging that the Allam baptism repeats the error of Regensburg -- a reference to the global controversy prompted by Pope Benedict XVIs Sept. 12, 2006, lecture at the University of Regensburg in Germany, where he quoted a 14th-century Byzantine emperor to the effect that Muhammad brought things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.
Stung by such protest, the Vatican newspaper, LOsservatore Romano, published a commentary on Tuesday by editor Gian Maria Vian insisting that there had been no hostile intent, and stressing the importance of religious freedom. Vian also asserted that Benedict XVI is committed to dialogue with Islam.
Be that as it may, its tough to believe anyone at the Vatican was actually surprised by the reaction. For one thing, Allam sometimes comes off as deliberately incendiary; he recently expressed the hope, for example, that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be captured by the Israelis and forced to live at the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial. For another, the Vatican is obviously aware, post-Regensburg, of keen sensitivity in the Islamic world to perceived papal slights.
Given those realities, why did Benedict do it? At least three possible reasons come to mind:
Allam himself confirmed the first two interpretations in his letter to Corriere della Sera, describing Benedicts act as a courageous and historical gesture as well as an explicit and revolutionary message that Christians should not be afraid to affirm the truth of Jesus, even among Muslims. He said that Benedict never hesitated to baptize him, from the first instant in which he learned of my desire.
All this notwithstanding, Vians argument in LOsservatore Romano is convincing on at least one point: Benedict XVI does genuinely seem to want dialogue with Islam, in a way that distinguishes his position from true anti-Islamic hawks (including, perhaps, Allam himself, at his most acerbic). Benedict went out of his way to meet with Islamic leaders in Cologne, Germany, during his first foreign trip, and he conducted a successful fence-mending exercise with Muslims during his November 2006 trip to Turkey, including a moment of silent prayer in Istanbuls Blue Mosque. He will sit down again with Muslims, along with leaders of other religions, during his April visit to the United States; and plans were recently finalized for a November meeting between the pope and signatories to a letter from 138 Muslim leaders proposing theological common ground between Christianity and Islam.
In other words, at precisely the same time that Benedict is challenging Muslims on religious freedom and the relationship between faith and reason, hes also determined to build relationships.
How does the pope reconcile those two impulses? Simple: In Benedicts worldview, the deepest threat today is not Islam, its the dictatorship of relativism, meaning secularism and moral and philosophical relativism in the West. In that struggle, Benedict believes a reformed, moderate Islam ought to be Christianitys natural ally. His efforts to stimulate such a reform, and his outstretched hand in dialogue, are, by that logic, perfectly consistent.
To date, the evidence is mixed as to whether Muslims actually experience what the pope is saying and doing in quite that spirit. Benedicts interreligious session in the States, as well as his November encounter with Islamic leaders in Rome, afford him new opportunities to make the case.
John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is email@example.com.
National Catholic Reporter, April 4, 2008
|Copyright © The
National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company, 115 E. Armour Blvd.,
Kansas City, MO 64111
All rights reserved.
TEL: 816-531-0538 FAX: 1-816-968-2280 Send comments about this Web site to: firstname.lastname@example.org